Author |
Message |
Registered: August 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,807 |
| Posted: | | | | I made up the -wise words. I hope their meaning is clear. | | | -- Enry |
|
| W0m6at | You're in for it now Tony |
Registered: April 17, 2007 | Posts: 1,091 |
| Posted: | | | | Although I want a good movie/series, I voted for the image/sound. Sure, I buy some public domain stuff that's rubbish, but I generally want the best version around, and will search high-and-low when needs-be. That said, self-constraint (trying to save) has kept me from buying the equipment and media to get the maximum quality (so I'm still watching SD, and only occasionally upscaling... on someone else's hardware).
I will generally strive though for OAR and original language as A+ maximum priorities (when I remember to check). | | | Adelaide Movie Buffs (info on special screenings, contests, bargains, etc. relevant to Adelaideans... and contests/bargains for other Aussies too!) |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | I'd rank them as: 1. The movie always comes first, provided it's uncut and uncensored, and in OAR and OST. 3. Important, but I'll take what I can get. 2. Depending on the extras offered and the quality/interest of the movie. 5. The price factor. 4. I don't care for fancy packaging or plastic toys, I don't have space for them anyway. That said, I certainly appreciate a nice cover design without disturbing spelling mistakes, quotes and ratings. | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 | | | Last edited: by Nexus the Sixth |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 1,982 |
| Posted: | | | | With the majority of what I have in my collection : the most important thing is that the film is release.
Usually I prefer to have the movie uncut and in his original language (I've even one German film without subtitles and I don't speak German at all). Sure the quality of the print use is important, but a very used print can be a part of the charm too. If the movie came with some extra I'm always happy, but this is not that important and the majority of what I have is not release in x number of edition.
So my answer is the first option, not that the others options are not important. But when you love the genre of movie that I like you are just happy to own them and feel lucky that they exist today. |
|
Registered: July 7, 2007 | Posts: 284 |
| Posted: | | | | OTHERwise. I have no single criterium.. It really depends on: - My mood - The movie - The price - Alternative availabilty and its price - Contents of my wallet | | | My DVD's
Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard drive? | | | Last edited: by RaymondG |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,136 |
| Posted: | | | | All of the above Well... show/film first, then features, then price the rest.... just nice if I can get | | | Signature? We don't need no stinking... hang on, this has been done... blast [oooh now in Widescreen] Ah... well you see.... I thought I'd say something more interesting... but cannot think of anything..... oh well And to those of you who have disabled viewing of these signature files "hello" (or not) Registered: July 27, 2004 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | You left out an option for me. A CRAZYone. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 489 |
| Posted: | | | | Another option missed.
Whenever I have money!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bobb | | | Do Cheshire Cats drink evaporated milk? |
|
Registered: March 17, 2007 | Posts: 46 |
| Posted: | | | | Well, it depends on the price, extras offered and my mood. | | | Teaching is an act of love |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,804 |
| Posted: | | | | All of the above including the (-wise) order! | | | Thorsten | | | Last edited: by kahless |
|
Registered: March 19, 2007 | Posts: 26 |
| Posted: | | | | This was kind of hard for me, probably because (as usual) I'm overthinking it.
At first I was going to say Movie-Wise, because who cares how good it looks if the content is lousy.
I ended up going with Techie-wise, though, because if a movie I really care about (good content) is only available in pan-and-scan, I won't buy it. So, I guess in the end the image and sound quality won out.
The packaging and extras, however, are relatively unimportant to me. I put all my DVDs in changers and folders without the packaging when they arrive, and I save the bonus disks but never end up watching them.
Sean | | | "If you can't win, change the rules." | | | Last edited: by splogue |
|
Registered: April 7, 2007 | Posts: 228 |
| Posted: | | | | 1- MOVIEwise: I mostly want a good movie/TV series. 1B- Star/genre(eh)wise.... is it a genre or sub genre/actor/director/producer that i love (i may add cinematographer and editor here!) 2- EXTRAwise: Bonus features make the difference. 3- TECHIEwise: Best possible image and sound quality is essential. 4- PACKAGEwise: I love the nifty case, booklets and gadgets... 5- OTHERwise. Please say. 6 ricewise.... ima student! and disabled for me it is a combination of the above with one added step. first how much do i want the movie or series. then who is in it what genre etc. then the features/and tech: the the version out there is it a good version or is there another (ie predator i want the predator head but it is more affordable to have the SE collection) or is there one with a Surround sound dts (i think that's the better one lol!) the the extras and ofc price.... there are other things i think about but to keep it simple ill leave it there | | | That's the thing about racism, though, most of it is covert.
"Freedom without Socialism is privilege and injustice and Socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality."Bakunin
“It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.”Churchill
Fire Next Time: http://www.valdosta.edu/~cawalker/baldwin.htm
Some people think football [and soccer] is a matter of life and death.... I can assure them it is much more serious than that. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,640 |
| Posted: | | | | My first option are that the Film must be exist in his original format , I'm really hate the pan and scan. Of course there are not many more, a good luck. Second : The Multi language and a good sound, since I like very much the classics one, I don't care about the 5.1 Sound. But it will not said that i'm don't like it. And of course a good packaging are not excluded, but not an option to buy them And at last I’m must like the film. . There are not many option but that’s O.K for ME jean | | | My collection |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | I'm wondering if the number 1 position listed is worded the best it could be ., The poll so far is 6 to 1 in favour of the movie over number three which states Best possible picture and sound quality is essential. I voted for the third choice as I am always on the lookout for a better picture ( anamorphic) and sound (5.1/DTS over Dolby surround ) any day .. Hands down. I must have gone thru two dozen titles so far when it comes to flipping and selling Older versions to Newer Collectors editions.
Can you say '2001 A Space Odyssey' ? I have updated this title at least 8 times in 25 years .. (three times on DVD ) Hopefully I'm finished . | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
|
Registered: August 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,807 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting widescreenforever: Quote: I'm wondering if the number 1 position listed is worded the best it could be ., I wonder myself, but as my excuse I can say it wasn't an easy task. Of course we all love good movies. Of course we all prefer good quality over poor quality. Of course good quality alone doesn't change a bad movie into a good movie... That said, there are some people who give a lot of thought to technical aspects: they wait for the best possible edition before they buy a movie they care for and they will readily double-dip when a better edition comes out, if the wallet permits. They are Number 3 people. Number 1 people instead would happily spend the same amount of money to own another good movie or TV series, most probably. They enjoy good image&sound as well as others do, but they don't feel as strongly as No.3's about technical perfection and have somewhat different spending priorities. Quote:
The poll so far is 6 to 1 in favour of the movie over number three which states Best possible picture and sound quality is essential. I voted for the third choice as I am always on the lookout for a better picture ( anamorphic) and sound (5.1/DTS over Dolby surround ) any day .. Hands down. I must have gone thru two dozen titles so far when it comes to flipping and selling Older versions to Newer Collectors editions.
Can you say '2001 A Space Odyssey' ? I have updated this title at least 8 times in 25 years .. (three times on DVD ) Hopefully I'm finished . You definitely are a Number 3. I think a Number 1 would have bought seven more good movies and updated 2001 just once if ever. | | | -- Enry | | | Last edited: by White Pongo, Jr. |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Patsa: Quote: I'd rank them as: 1. The movie always comes first, provided it's uncut and uncensored, and in OAR and OST. 3. Important, but I'll take what I can get. 2. Depending on the extras offered and the quality/interest of the movie. 5. The price factor. 4. I don't care for fancy packaging or plastic toys, I don't have space for them anyway. That said, I certainly appreciate a nice cover design without disturbing spelling mistakes, quotes and ratings. This covers my priority settings as well | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|