| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 1,136 |
| | Posted: | | | | Number 1 on release in UK, and now.... Number 1 in the USofA too! I really enjoyed it when I saw it 2 weeks ago (Wow, a film that opened in the UK first.... that is a rare event these days) What do you all think of it? | | | Signature? We don't need no stinking... hang on, this has been done... blast [oooh now in Widescreen]
Ah... well you see.... I thought I'd say something more interesting... but cannot think of anything..... oh well
And to those of you who have disabled viewing of these signature files "hello" (or not) Registered: July 27, 2004 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 66 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'll wait for the DVD!!!!  |
|
| Registered: April 3, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 1,998 |
| | Posted: | | | | Kermode reviews QoS (May contain spoilers?) |
|
| Registered: March 17, 2007 | | Posts: 853 |
| | Posted: | | | | I really enjoyed the film. I went with my best friend on opening night. I was disappointed to arrive at a half full theatre that was mostly teenagers. A lot of texting during the film. I was also sad to see 007 return to the signiture PPK of old. I was hoping they would leave him with the HK and its superior round. I liked the way way they went back to his quirky puns and the relationship they built between him and M. I was not happy that this film seemed to just be a bridge to the next one though. Also the new group is Quantum what kind of crap is that? | | | | Last edited: by Lord Of The Sith |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,692 |
| | Posted: | | | | I thought it was excellent. Surely the reason why he had the PFK was Spoiler: (Select to view)He was acting without authority and had his usual guns taken off him. So couldn't take his big ones through customs etc. It's been announced that this is the 2nd part of a 3 parter. | | | | Paul |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | | Posts: 101 |
| | Posted: | | | | I enjoyed it also. On another note Olga is hot. | | | | Sometimes you are the bowling ball, sometimes you are the pins. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,293 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting FunkyLA: Quote:
What do you all think of it? Decent plot (despite problems with the writer's strike though which could have been made clearer with a little more exposition - some important points you only had the chance to catch from one quick line) and excellent acting but marred (very badly in my opinion) by appalling fast-cut editing and close-up camera work in the action scenes that meant it wasn't possible to appreciate the excellent set piece work. There were actually times when it was so choppy that one person I was with couldn't even follow whether Bond was chasing someone or being chased for a lot of one scene (and they're not a stupid person). I've heard many agree with this BTW, and also put forward the suggestion it'll actually be easier to make out on a smaller screen... typical one of the 4 movies I've seen at the cinema this year I should have waited for on DVD! Quoting Lord of the Sith Quote:
I liked the way way they went back to his quirky puns Surprised to hear that... most comments I've heard (and I agree) say the film was very lacking in this department and this actually was a major criticism in that it wasn't Bond-like enough (just a Bourne clone) as there weren't enough/hadly any Bond like puns. P.S. Re-watch Casino Royale just before you see it; it really helps to know who some of the protagonists they're referring to are as they assume you remember and this film follows on almost exactly where the last finishes. | | | | It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong | | | | Last edited: by Voltaire53 |
|
  | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 8,736 |
| | Posted: | | | | I enjoyed it as well, but I'll echo Voltaire53's sentiments with regards to the fast-cut editing and close-up camera work in the action scenes. I understand that the producers need to cater to a young demographic, but it was a bit too much for my taste. And indeed: exactly because of those editing choices and the close-up camera work, it may well work a bit better on the small screen. Other than that: I'd like to have seen a little bit more of Gemma Arterton - I felt she was given too little screen time.
My tips for Bond 23: a little, just a little bit less of that "hip" editing, let's re-introduce Moneypenny and Q, and the occasional quip would be nice. All those deadly serious looks, those deeply-hurt people and "big" themes like trust and revenge are perfectly fine, but a little more actual fun wouldn't go amiss. And also, while I like David Arnold's work and hope he stays on, I'd like him to increase the use of the Bond theme thoughout the film just a tad. I fully understand (and agree!) that it doesn't need to blare out of the speakers for the full two hours, but I'd enjoy it if it was woven into the score just once in while. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,692 |
| | Posted: | | | | Having thought some more of the kermode review, what I do agree is that: Spoiler: (Select to view)Nobody seemed to be hurt. For instance there was one scene where Bond was cut in the hotel room - 5 mins later - no blood/cut etc. Thats what I call fast healing!
And Gemma's acting - wooden isn't the half of it. even seeing her oiled body didn't excite me! | | | | Paul |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote:
And also, while I like David Arnold's work and hope he stays on, I'd like him to increase the use of the Bond theme thoughout the film just a tad. I fully understand (and agree!) that it doesn't need to blare out of the speakers for the full two hours, but I'd enjoy it if it was woven into the score just once in while. I saw an interview with David Arnold and the reason the bond theme isn't used is because: Spoiler: (Select to view)As this was Bond in training, he hadn't earned the theme yet, which is why it was never used in Casino Royale. So the introduction of the theme at the end of this film is a way of introducing the fully-formed Bond. |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,736 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote:
I saw an interview with David Arnold and the reason the bond theme isn't used is because: I read that too - I indeed hope that means it'll pop up now and again in the next one! |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 2,694 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting FunkyLA: Quote:
Number 1 on release in UK, and now....
Number 1 in the USofA too!
I really enjoyed it when I saw it 2 weeks ago (Wow, a film that opened in the UK first.... that is a rare event these days)
What do you all think of it? Saw it Sunday. First, let me say that I think Daniel Craig is the best Bond of all of them, including Connery. Don't get me wrong, Sean Connery was great and is one of my favorite actors, but Craig is much closer to the way Ian Fleming wrote Bond and I prefer that character to the one that Hollywood created over the last 20 years. I thoroughly enjoyed QoS, and I had no trouble following the plot at all. There has been a lot of blather on Chicago radio the last couple days about it, and a bunch of self-styled critics have been panning it. Never mind that it has been packing people in in droves... | | | John
"Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice!" Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964
Make America Great Again! |
|
 | kemper | | Vodka martini... shaken.. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 402 |
| | Posted: | | | | Hope to catch it this weekend.... kids are away and the mice will play! |
|
| Registered: June 9, 2007 | | Posts: 1,208 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quote: Quote:
Bond's gone Quantum Isn't quantum really small Funky? Joking aside I just got back from watching this and although I didn't enjoy it as much as I thought I would I was still impressed. I think I just wasn't in the right mood for it, and I was a little disappointed that the trailer for the new Trek film wasn't on at the beginning  I'd heard that it was, and that's partly why I went to watch Bond, is it just in the US that it was? Edit: Nevermind it's now available for download. Created a thread. | | | | Last edited: by MarEll |
|
| kemper | | Vodka martini... shaken.. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 402 |
| | Posted: | | | | Finally saw it.... a little too much cutting during some of the fight and chase scenes... but worth it none the less |
|
| Registered: September 3, 2007 | | Posts: 163 |
| | Posted: | | | | I saw it about 5 days after it was released. I did like it, but I hated the editing and shaky camera work used in some sequences. | | |  |
|