Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

  Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion Page: 1 2  Previous   Next
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (Locked)
Author Message
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorhal9g
Who is John Galt?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 6,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collection
Quote:
Dr. Sam Vaknin is an Israeli psychologist. Interesting view
on our new president.

Dr. Vaknin has written extensively about narcissism.



Dr. Vaknin States "I must confess I was impressed by
Sen.Barack Obama from the first time I saw him. At first I was excited to
see a black candidate. He looked youthful, spoke well, appeared to be
confident - a wholesome presidential package. I was put off soon, not just
because of his shallowness but also because there was an air of haughtiness
in his demeanor that was unsettling. His posture and his body language were
louder than his empty words. Obama's speeches are unlike any political
speech we have heard in American history. Never a politician in this land
had such quasi "religious" impact on so many people. The fact that Obama is
a total incognito with zero accomplishment, makes this inexplicable
infatuation alarming. Obama is not an ordinary man. He is not a genius. In
fact he is quite ignorant on most important subjects."



Barack Obama is a narcissist.


Dr. Sam Vaknin, the author of the Malignant Self Love believes

"Barack Obama appears to be a narcissist." Vaknin is a world authority on
narcissism. He understands narcissism and describes the inner mind of a
narcissist like no other person. When he talks about narcissism everyone
listens. Vaknin says that Obama's language, posture and demeanor, and the
testimonies of his closest, dearest and nearest suggest that the Senator is
either a narcissist or he may have narcissistic personality disorder (NPD).
Narcissists project a grandiose but false image of themselves. Jim Jones,
the charismatic leader of People's Temple, the man who led over 900 of his
followers to cheerfully commit mass suicide and even murder their own
children was also a narcissist. David Koresh, Charles Manson, Joseph Koni,
Shoko Asahara, Stalin, Saddam, Mao,Kim Jong Ill and Adolph Hitler are a few
examples of narcissists of our time. All these men had a tremendous
influence over their fanciers. They created a personality cult around
themselves and with their blazing speeches elevated their admirers, filled
their hearts with enthusiasm and instilled in their minds a new zest for
life. They gave them hope! They promised them the moon, but alas,
invariably they brought them to their doom. When you are a victim of a cult
of personality, you don't know it until it is too late. One determining
factor in the development of NPD is childhood abuse.

"Obama's early life was decidedly chaotic and replete with
traumatic and mentally bruising dislocations," says Vaknin. "Mixed-race
marriages were even less common then. His parents went through a divorce
when he was an infant (two years old). Obama saw his father only once
again, before he died in a car accident. Then his mother re-married and
Obama had to relocate to Indonesia, a foreign land with a radically foreign
culture, to be raised by a step-father. At the age of ten, he was whisked
off to live with his maternal (white)grandparents. He saw his mother only
intermittently in the following few years and then she vanished from his
life in 1979. She died of cancer in 1995".

One must never underestimate the manipulative genius of
pathological narcissists. They project such an imposing personality that
it overwhelms those around them. Charmed by the charisma of the narcissist,
people become like clay in his hands. They cheerfully do his bidding and
delight to be at his service. The narcissist shapes the world around
himself and reduces others in his own inverted image. He creates a cult of
personality. His admirers become his co-dependents. Narcissists have no
interest in things that do not help them to reach their personal objective.
They are focused on one thing alone and that is power. All other issues
are meaningless to them and they do not want to waste their precious time on
trivialities. Anything that does not help them is beneath them and do not
deserve their attention.

If an issue raised in the Senate does not help Obama in one
way or another, he has no interest in it. The "present" vote is a safe
vote. No one can criticize him if things go wrong. Those issues are
unworthy by their very nature because they are not about him. Obama's
election as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review led to a
contract and advance to write a book about race relations.

The University of Chicago Law School provided him a lot longer
than expected forum and it evolved into, guess what? His own
autobiography! Instead of writing a scholarly paper focusing on race
relations, for which he had been paid, Obama could not resist writing about
his most sublime self. He entitled the book Dreams from My Father.

Not surprisingly, Adolph Hitler also wrote his own
autobiography when he was still nobody. So did Stalin. For a narcissist
no subject is as important as his own self. Why would he waste his
precious time and genius writing about insignificant things when he can
write about such an august being as himself? Narcissists are often callous
and even ruthless. As the norm, they lack conscience. This is evident
from Obama's lack of interest in his own brother who lives on only one
dollar per month.

A man who lives in luxury, who takes a private jet to vacation
in Hawaii, and who has raised nearly half a billion dollars for his campaign
(something unprecedented in history) has no interest in the plight of his
own brother. Why? Because, his brother cannot be used for his ascent to
power.

A narcissist cares for no one but himself. This election is
like no other in the history of America. The issues are insignificant
compared to what is at stake. What can be more dangerous than having a man
bereft of conscience, a serial liar, and one who cannot distinguish his
fantasies from reality as the leader of the free world? I hate to sound
alarmist, but one is a fool if one is not alarmed. Many politicians are
narcissists. They pose no threat to others...They are simply self serving
and selfish.

Obama evidences symptoms of pathological narcissism, which is
different from the run-of-the-mill narcissism of a Richard Nixon or a Bill
Clinton for example. To him reality and fantasy are intertwined. This is a
mental health issue, not just a character flaw. Pathological narcissists
are dangerous because they look normal and even intelligent. It is this
disguise that makes them treacherous.

Today the Democrats have placed all their hopes in Obama.
But this man could put an end to their party. The great majority of blacks
have also decided to vote for Obama. Only a fool does not know that their
support for him is racially driven. This is racism, pure and simple. The
downside of this is that if Obama turns out to be the disaster I predict, he
will cause widespread resentment among the whites.

The blacks are unlikely to give up their support of their
man. Cultic mentality is pernicious and unrelenting. They will dig their
heads deeper in the sand and blame Obama's detractors of racism. This will
cause a backlash among the whites.

The white supremacists will take advantage of
the discontent and they will receive widespread support. I
predict that in less than four years, racial tensions will increase to
levels never seen since the turbulent 1960's.

Obama will set the clock back decades... America is the
bastion of freedom. The peace of the world depends on the strength of
America, and its weakness translates into the triumph of terrorism and
victory of rogue nations.

It is no wonder that Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, the Castrists,
the Hezbollah, the Hamas, the lawyers of the Guantanamo terrorists and
virtually all sworn enemies of America are so thrilled by the prospect of
their man in the White House. America is on the verge of destruction. There
is no insanity greater than electing a pathological narcissist as president.
Hal
 Last edited: by hal9g
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributordee1959jay
Registered: March 19, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 6,018
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collection
Sam Vaknin himself states:

"I am not a mental health professional though I am certified in psychological counseling techniques by Brainbench."

here.

Here's some interesting reading on the man - including this sentence: "Vaknin was diagnosed with NPD in 1996, while serving a prison sentence in Israel."

Need I say more?
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorBad Father
Registered: July 23, 2001
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 4,596
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collection
Quoting dee1959jay:
Quote:
"Vaknin was diagnosed with NPD in 1996, while serving a prison sentence in Israel."

Need I say more?


Guess it takes a narcissist to know one .
My WebGenDVD online Collection
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributordee1959jay
Registered: March 19, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 6,018
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collection
His "doctorate" - if any - is from "Pacific Western University", a non-accredited distance-learning institution that has a reputation as a diploma-mill, where he allegedly majored in Philosophy of Physics. Funny thing is: even this bogus institution, now called "California Miramar University" does not pretend to offer doctoral courses.
Its Hawaii branch was shut down by court order after losing a lawsuit filed by the state.

When the US General Accounting Office presented the results of an eight month examination of diploma mills and federal employees holding their degrees to the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs in May 2004, Pacific Western University in Los Angeles was one of the six schools on which the investigation focused.

Just to mention a few things on the credentials of this clown.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorSrehtims
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 1,796
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collection
I t is my understanding that all the psychological definitions and terminology are voted at convention and thus has no scientific proof. Any time you have only human language as a source definition of something there is a possibility for a fog factor. That why the legal system loves them so, my quack against your quack. Quack = professional witness.

Lets face it one of the common themes that run through out history of humanity is the desire for one human to control an other human, whether by knowledge, financial  or physical strength. Example the Catholic Church suppression of earth orbiting about the sun or in today's news the suppression of the perversion of their priesthood. In 714 B.C. an Egyptian calculated the circumference of earth very close to what satellites have determined.

The scientific biological causes for mental problems is an on going research.
Even when I took psychology in the late '60s, many of the psychological studies were proved to be flawed.

Recent lectures from the Teaching Company I have enjoyed:
Understanding the Brain, Dr. Jeanette Norden, Neuroscience, Professor of Cell and Developmental Biology; Vanderbilt University;

The following lecture series points out a number flawed psychological studies. 
Biology and Human Behavior, The Neurological Origins of Individuality, Robert Sapolsky, Professor  of Neuroscience, Stanford University

You don't need a degree in psychology to see that Obama is to put it in ever day language "full of himself."
We don't need stinkin' IMDB's errors, we make our own.
Ineptocracy, You got to love it.
"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." - Abraham Lincoln
 Last edited: by Srehtims
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this user
Did you bother to check up on any of that article or did you automatically believe it simply because it's about someone you didn't vote for.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/vaknin.asp

http://www.faithfreedom.org/obama.html
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorhal9g
Who is John Galt?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 6,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collection
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
Did you bother to check up on any of that article or did you automatically believe it simply because it's about someone you didn't vote for.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/vaknin.asp

http://www.faithfreedom.org/obama.html


Where exactly did I indicate to you that I believed the article? 

In fact, where in the OP did I indicate anything whatsoever? 

And were you in the voting booth with me?  I don't remember seeing you at the time.   
Hal
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantVibroCount
The Truth is Silly Putty
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 5,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collection
Am I the only one old enough to remember the September/October 1964 issue of Fact: magazine?

The cover:



Using long-distance psychiatry to diagnose mental illnesses in political figures is not new, even 45 years ago... and it has never become any bit accurate.
If it wasn't for bad taste, I wouldn't have no taste at all.

Cliff
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,202
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collection
I am confused as to the purpose of this thread.

From what I can tell, thanks to northbloke and snopes, Dr. Sam Vaknin is not a psychologist.  His PHD, hence the title of Dr., is in philosophy not psychology.  So, if he had written the article, it would have to be taken with a grain of salt.

In addition, thanks again to northbloke and snopes, since the article was written by a man with an agenda...Ali Sina...it has to be taken with a grain of salt.

Is it an interesting read?  Not really.  Especially when you take some of the author's other works into consideration.
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
 Last edited: by TheMadMartian
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributordee1959jay
Registered: March 19, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 6,018
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collection
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
Did you bother to check up on any of that article or did you automatically believe it simply because it's about someone you didn't vote for.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/vaknin.asp

http://www.faithfreedom.org/obama.html


Where exactly did I indicate to you that I believed the article? 

In fact, where in the OP did I indicate anything whatsoever? 

And were you in the voting booth with me?  I don't remember seeing you at the time.   


In your very first sentence you say "Dr. Sam Vaknin is an Israeli psychologist". In fact, he is NOT a psychologist, and his doctorate is highly questionable, as I've demonstrated. Thus, you are - intentionally or not - lending credibility to someone who clearly does NOT deserve it (we ARE talking about a convicted criminal here).
You are also calling his views "interesting", which IS an appreciation. I'd say they're about as interesting as any other criminal's views are.

@Srehtims:
If you really need to know, I DO hold an MSc in Psychology, and from a fully accredited institution at that. As such, I have no idea what you're on about when you're talking about psychological definitions and terminology. Psychology in its proper meaning is a research-based science like any other (of course, I'm not referring to the zillions of quacks out there - believe me: I detest those more than you do).
Phrases like "You don't need a degree in psychology to see that Obama is to put it in ever day language "full of himself."" are scary, to say the very least. A PROFESSIONAL psychologist would never EVER lend himself to doing "distance diagnoses" without even having done a thorough examination of the person in question. So phrases like these have about as much credibility as either Sam Vaknin or Ali Sina.
Perhaps it's a bit TOO long ago you "took psychology" (whatever that means). What the Catholic Church has got to do with anything eludes me even further.
 Last edited: by dee1959jay
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorhal9g
Who is John Galt?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 6,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collection
Quoting dee1959jay:
Quote:

In your very first sentence you say "Dr. Sam Vaknin is an Israeli psychologist". In fact, he is NOT a psychologist, and his doctorate is highly questionable, as I've demonstrated. Thus, you are - intentionally or not - lending credibility to someone who clearly does NOT deserve it (we ARE talking about a convicted criminal here).
You are also calling his views "interesting", which IS an appreciation. I'd say they're about as interesting as any other criminal's views are.


The entire original post is a quote.

I did not write any of it.
Hal
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantVibroCount
The Truth is Silly Putty
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 5,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collection
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
The entire original post is a quote.

I did not write any of it.


Gee, I wonder who posted it, and why?

If it wasn't for bad taste, I wouldn't have no taste at all.

Cliff
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorLewis_Prothero
Strength Through Unity
Registered: May 19, 2007
Reputation: Superior Rating
Germany Posts: 6,730
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collection
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
And were you in the voting booth with me?  I don't remember seeing you at the time.   

That's because he can hide himself so extremely good!  

But Hal, it seems quite obvious that if you post the uncommented quotation of an article, that you agree with it to a certain extend.
Otherwise you should be prepared to answer the question why you posted it?
It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?


Registrant since 05/22/2003
 Last edited: by Lewis_Prothero
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorhal9g
Who is John Galt?
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 6,635
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collection
It's pretty simple.

I, unlike Unicus, found it to be interesting.
Hal
 Last edited: by hal9g
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNexus the Sixth
Contributor since 2002
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Sweden Posts: 3,197
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collection
Quote:
Not surprisingly, Adolph Hitler also wrote his own
autobiography when he was still nobody.


Not surprisingly, the author managed to invoke Godwin's law.

Quote:
References to Godwin's Law often actually refer to a corollary of it which determines that the person who first makes an unwarranted reference to Nazi Germany or Hitler in an argument loses that argument automatically.
First registered: February 15, 2002
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,202
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collection
Quoting hal9g:
Quote:
The entire original post is a quote.

I did not write any of it.

We were supposed to figure that out how?  As originally posted, it looked like a comment, by you, followed by the 'interesting read'.  Is there some reason you did not include the source of the quote or some other indication that it was, in fact, a quote? 

Quote:
It's pretty simple.

I, unlike Unicus, found it to be interesting.

I find it very hard to view crap like that as interesting.  Especially when it is falsely attributed to a quack yet, in reality, written by a someone with an agenda.  I won't quote the statements I have read, as they are a tad offensive, but do a search on him and you will see he is a total nutjob. 
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
  Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion Page: 1 2  Previous   Next