Just wanted some opinions on this. In the discussions on moderation someone made a comment that seemed to indicate that the poster found sarcasm unwanted.

As I personally find sarcasm to be just another tool that can be used in discussions, and I use it on occasion, I'd like to know if you think this is wrong.

I'll provide an example. I once wrote something like this (I couldn't find the actual post right now):

First you said that she's not part of the cast list. Now you say that she is. Did the rules change in the meantime?

Sure, I could have written "Did you change your opinion?" or something like that. I just find that a gently humorous prod like that helps the discussion along.

In my mind this type of sarcasm isn't insulting or an attack or anything like that. But I guess others may interpret it differently. What say you?

I don't view that comment as sarcasm, Gunnar, I view it as spoiling for a fight. And i have told you that before. You may intend it as sarcasm, but I see it as simply trying to get a fight going.

Quoting Prof. Kingsfield:

Quote:
I don't view that comment as sarcasm, Gunnar, I view it as spoiling for a fight. And i have told you that before. You may intend it as sarcasm, but I see it as simply trying to get a fight going.

I could make a sarcastic remark here, but I'll refrain, if that's what it takes to avoid a fight. But then again it seems some people don't need sarcasm to start a fight. 

Quoting GSyren:

Quote:
What say you?

Sarcasm is difficult to convey online, and people are often quick to interpret what they read in the most negative way possible.  So, while not wrong (IMO), it's probably unhelpful.

However, I reserve the right to use it myself without warning. 

---------------

No, sarcasm brings rainbows and puppies.

Quoting Ace_of_Sevens:

Quote:
No, sarcasm brings rainbows and puppies.

Means:
It's raining in your back and the carpet is full of poo and pee.   

Concerning the  Definition of sarcasm

1 : a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2 a : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual

I think as a previous poster said, is difficult to convey in typed word. If it was meant in jest, we cannot see your expression to know this.

I wouldn't want to ban sarcasm, but we must be careful how and when it is used.  A lot of times, if used in the middle of an argument, could be interpreted as "Fightin' Words"

Charlie

You're all, hockey pucks.         Gracias Senor Rickles