|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion |
Page:
1... 14 15 16 17 18 ...25 Previous Next
|
Why Liberals Just Lovve Obama |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Posts: 262 |
| Posted: | | | | Northbloke, Like I said before I don't expect you (or others who simply demand proof of Obama's Marxist ties when you know you'll refuse to consider any information you receive) to thoughtfully consider that perhaps there is legitimate reason to be concerned about Obama's radical past. The MSM is doing a great job of mostly ignoring his odious associations -- Wright, Ayers, Rezko -- and endorsements -- Farrakhan, Hamas, Ortega -- so why should you be any different. For my part I particularly enjoyed it when Obama consistently referred to the anti-semitic bigot Farrakhan as "Minister" in a respectful tone. I also love the picture of radical communist murderer Guevara on the wall of his campaign office. Yeah those nuts that say he's a Marxist where do they get off..... Brian |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,694 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Sugar:
Have you read the books written by Obama (partcularly Dreams of My Father), obviously NOT, I have, those and more.
Let me make it even more clear , the man IS a Marxist.
Skip Breaking News! -- WorldNetDaily has a story this morning saying that Obama DID NOT write "Dreams of My Father," and that Bill Ayers actually did the writing. Considering that Obama has held this book up and used it to build up his own persona on the campaign trail, this is akin to plagiarizing. At the very least it shows Obama to be nothing but a cheap suit talking out of both sides of his face. | | | John
"Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice!" Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964 Make America Great Again! |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Posts: 262 |
| Posted: | | | | Fubar,
Just more proof of my point -- you claim to be interested in "evidence" of Obama's marxism and when presented you reject the evidence out of hand b/c it comes from a source you don't like. You claim Skip is the one failing to present evidence to back his claims and then you reject outright an article without apparently even reading it, checking its accuracy, or refuting its claims. There are many verifiable quotes and articles quoted in the article -- are they correct? You don't seem to care....so much for your claim to be interested in evidence!
You are the ultimate pot calling the kettle black when it comes to Skip. Why pretend to be reasonably asking for evidence when you really don't want any? All you've done simply throw undocumented and baseless accusations back when "evidence" is presented - the very thing you berated Skip for. |
| Registered: April 8, 2007 | Posts: 1,057 |
| Posted: | | | | Hi Brian, I've read the article seems like innuendo & guilt by association, nothing proved. Your source seems to be to the Right of anyone on this forum, hardly diverse. Quote: [a href="Overview AIM was founded by Reed Irvine in 1969, when Irvine called for sedition charges to be brought against Students for a Democratic Society, the Black Panthers and the Progressive Labor Party, arguing, "If you're going to halt treason, you've got to do it while it's small." [Village Voice, January 21, 1986] In the 1970s, Irvine endeared himself to the New Right by alleging that the corporate media were a propaganda tool for the Soviet KGB and Fidel Castro. In 1982, AIM attacked New York Times reporter Raymond Bonner for his reports (later proven accurate--see Extra!, January/February 1993) about the El Mozote massacre. Along with the Wall Street Journal editorial page, AIM succeeded in pressing the Times to pull Bonner from his Salvadoran beat. Irvine later called for napalm to be used against FMLN guerrillas in El Salvador. (AIM Report, March 1990). During the Gulf War, he encouraged a nuclear strike against Iraq. [Seattle Times, January 16, 1991] With the end of the Cold War, AIM now assails environmentalists as the "infiltrators" of the media establishment. Critical reports about industries that fund AIM--such as chemical and oil interests--ara a frequent target of AIM critiques. During the Clinton era, alleged conspiracies related to the Democratic president were a frequent topic in AIM's work--particularly the notion that Vince Foster was not a suicide but a victim of foul play. AIM charged that Republicans, including independent counsel Kenneth Starr, were somehow complicit in covering up Clinton's plots; discussing Hillary Rodham Clinton's notion of a "vast right-wing conspiracy," Irvine retorted that "the only conspiracy I knew of was the conspiracy of the Republican leadership to protect Bill Clinton." [AIM Report, February 1998] AIM has been criticized as a censorious group eager to silence voices it disagrees with and disdainful of the First Amendment. The group for a time offered as a donation premium Target America, written by AIM board member James L. Tyson, a book advocating that government "ombudsmen" police major-network newscasts for "accuracy" and "fairness". [1] Reed Irvine suffered a stroke in 2003 and died in November 2004. His son, Don Irvine, succeeded him as AIM chairman. "] See: Take Care Rico | | | If I felt any better I'd be sick! Envy is mental theft. If you covet another mans possessions, then you should be willing to take on his responsibilities, heartaches, and troubles, along with his money. D. Koontz | | | Last edited: by Rico |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,694 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting sugarjoe: Quote: Quoting skipnet50:
Quote: Like i told Fubar, sugar. You also have no stake in our political process nor any ability to vote in it. But you can make yourself at least become informed if you wish to address issues. READ THE BOOKS. Yo have libraries in the UK, you don't have to buy them. 3
Skip
Translation: I can not document my statement. He most certainly did. He told you the source of the information that led to his opinion. It is NOT incumbent on him to regurgitate that word for word. If you wish to verify what he said, read the book and either refute what he said, or not. | | | John
"Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice!" Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964 Make America Great Again! |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,694 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting rincewind: Quote: Quoting sugarjoe:
Quote: Quoting skipnet50:
Quote: What you have here is a who does not believe in Democracy, he believes in the Collective. Skip
You have a very extreme position here, again you fail to present any underlying facts. What do you expect from a person who uses the word liberal as an insult and not able to distinguish between communism, socialism and social democracy? Skips political development seems to be stopped at the end of the McCarthy era. There is very little difference between the three, except a matter of degree. | | | John
"Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice!" Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964 Make America Great Again! |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Posts: 262 |
| Posted: | | | | Rico,
There is not going to be a "smoking gun" here and no outright "proof" whatever that would constitute. The issue is what are Obama's true feelings about the US, Capitalism etc. and are they quite a bit different than what he's presenting. You say "guilt by association" - this is not a criminal trial where Obama is entitled to proof beyond a reasonable doubt this is an election to decide who will become leader of the most nation on earth during very trying times.
I say his past associations, friendships, and connections are very relevant to this election and whether he is who he says he is. The evidence presented in the article(s) isn't "conclusive" nor can it be realistically but it does raise questions about his radical past and whether the smooth talking seemingly moderate uniter he claims to be is a fraud.
Of course you are entitled to your own view of the material and I respect you for reading it and coming up with a thoughtful response. As I well know (and you pointed out) AIM has a spotty history but does that mean they are wrong or offbase 100% of the time? I don't think so...
Brian |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Posts: 262 |
| Posted: | | | | More evidence to add to the pile..... Quote: Obama’s Marxist Roots Exposed
Criticism of Barack Obama’s infamous role as a community organizer has been labeled racist and inappropriately demeaning but few know that the Democratic presidential candidate’s sort of “organizing” is based on a revolutionary Marxists agenda.
Most people wouldn’t know that based on media coverage of the controversy, which has focused on Obama’s fiery speeches defending his noble community organizer duties as promoting social change from the bottom up and rejuvenating impoverished neighborhoods that have “fallen on hard times.”
Plenty of sound bites have featured passionate liberals vehemently defending their messiah’s good work and one major state’s governor actually accusing Republicans of being racist for using the words community organizer as a “code for black.”
Lost in the hoopla is that the crucial history of the sort of community organizing that Obama proudly conducted in Chicago; the role was developed by an extreme leftwing radical intellectual (Saul Alinsky) from Chicago who promoted a Marxist revolution through systematic deception.
In an article published this week by a British news magazine that focuses on politics, Obama’s true Marxist colors are exposed as well as his connections to Alinsky, whom he never met but idolized. The Illinois senator was trained by an Alinsky-founded group and he worked for an organization that promoted the radical’s so-called just and democratic society.
Obama’s goal, according to the exposé, was promoting the cause of black people and achieving “reparations” from white society, a perspective through which his welfare redistribution agenda is framed. During his three-year community organizer stint in Chicago, he mobilized black people for action against their white oppressors.
This is why the senator joined forces with the now famous Trinity Church of Christ, run by the radical longtime pastor (Jeremiah Wright) who blamed the U.S. for causing the 2001 terrorist attacks and damned America for treating blacks less than human. Wright married the Obama’s and baptized their two children and the senator made his good friend and pastor an important presidential campaign advisor.
Considering that Obama could very well become the nation’s next commander-in-chief, his documented Marxist roots certainly deserve more coverage in the mainstream American media. Don’t hold your breathe, though. Fubar, Northbloke, et al. -- what do think about the material presented -- is you position that it is untrue, irrelevant, what? Do you agree he has Marxist leaning and don't care -- what is your position? Perhaps you'll just spout off again with some snarky and pointless attack - but I'd like to see some analysis of the information.... Brian |
| Registered: June 3, 2007 | Posts: 333 |
| Posted: | | | | This is getting pretty funny. Even if we take the article at face value... so what?
He knew a socialist therefore he is one? That kind of logic doesn't pass the laugh test.
I've known a number of racists in my life... does that make me a racist?
As far as endorsements go... Anyone in politics is going to get an endorsement from someone they would rather have just kept their mouth shut. With our system being what it is, endorsements are not always given to someone who shares all your values but to the person who's values are less odious then the other guys. |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 374 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Rifter: Quote: Quoting sugarjoe:
Quote: Quoting skipnet50:
Quote: Like i told Fubar, sugar. You also have no stake in our political process nor any ability to vote in it. But you can make yourself at least become informed if you wish to address issues. READ THE BOOKS. Yo have libraries in the UK, you don't have to buy them. 3
Skip
Translation: I can not document my statement.
He most certainly did. He told you the source of the information that led to his opinion. It is NOT incumbent on him to regurgitate that word for word. If you wish to verify what he said, read the book and either refute what he said, or not. |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Posts: 262 |
| Posted: | | | | Snark, I think the information shows more than just he knew a "socialist" but rather he had a mentor type relationship with one. Furthermore there is more than just one such association in his past. If you had lots of racist friends, went to church run by one for 20 years and called the pastor a mentor and friend, donated money to racist groups, and worked with racists on foundation boards, appeared with them at seminars, and endorsed the book of one -- yeah then maybe just maybe I'd think you might be a racist....and I'd think it more so if you lied or obfuscated about these contacts, tried to shut people up who were talking about them, and tried to prevent ads calling attention to them from going on the air. But that's just me being funny I guess...... Brian |
| Registered: April 8, 2007 | Posts: 1,057 |
| Posted: | | | | Hi Brian, Quote: Brian wrote: There is not going to be a "smoking gun" here and no outright "proof" whatever that would constitute. The issue is what are Obama's true feelings about the US, Capitalism etc. and are they quite a bit different than what he's presenting.
To get a fair answer to this question, we should be talking to Obama. Not some rag which has a Quote: AIM has a spotty history and most likely prejudicial against him. Quote: Brian wrote: I say his past associations, friendships, and connections are very relevant to this election and whether he is who he says he is. The evidence presented in the article(s) isn't "conclusive" nor can it be realistically but it does raise questions about his radical past and whether the smooth talking seemingly moderate uniter he claims to be is a fraud. It's not reasonable to hold this against the man for his childhood association etc. Your concerns would, hold more water, if you can come up with corroboration from the left. Take Care Rico | | | If I felt any better I'd be sick! Envy is mental theft. If you covet another mans possessions, then you should be willing to take on his responsibilities, heartaches, and troubles, along with his money. D. Koontz |
| Registered: June 3, 2007 | Posts: 333 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting bbursiek: Quote: Snark,
I think the information shows more than just he knew a "socialist" but rather he had a mentor type relationship with one. Furthermore there is more than just one such association in his past. If you had lots of racist friends, went to church run by one for 20 years and called the pastor a mentor and friend, donated money to racist groups, and worked with racists on foundation boards, appeared with them at seminars, and endorsed the book of one -- yeah then maybe just maybe I'd think you might be a racist....and I'd think it more so if you lied or obfuscated about these contacts, tried to shut people up who were talking about them, and tried to prevent ads calling attention to them from going on the air.
But that's just me being funny I guess......
Brian I gotta say that I don't think there's much evidence regarding this alleged mentor like relationship. There's nothing beyond an assertion that "Frank" is "Frank Marshall Davis". In any case I've had mentor like relationships with people in my life and oddly enough, those didn't shape my political views. I shaped them based my own values. Could there have been some influence? Sure. Maybe. But Obama's platform doesn't reflect the charge of "socialist". It's not one I agree with personally, but it's nowhere near as extreme as those on the right would like to paint it. As far as "lied or obfuscated about these contacts"... I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that. Just a lot of hot air from people who will keep on beating the same dead horse until Obama admits some sort of illicit relationship. Not because they believe it, but because they have to. McCain has to be the least inspiring cantidate to a party base in 20 years or more. They have to bash Obama because talking up McCain is a non-starter. The lack of enthusiasm for McCain is what is going to keep him out of the Whitehouse. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting eagle61397: Quote: Quoting hal9g:
Quote: Quoting eagle61397:
Quote: You can say the same thing about McCain. Up until this Friday McCain was inciting terrorists at his rallies.
This is a simply outrageous statement and demonstrates that you are incapable of serious discussions about the current political race. Maybe terrorist was not the right word to use, but when you use fear tactics to incite outrageous remarks from your supporters and don't do anything about it for a few days, people start talking. (...) To be fair, and I may be late on this as I am two pages behind, McCain did finally say something. While he should get dinged for his lateness, he should also get points for speaking up. Quoting John McCain: Quote: "I have to tell you, he is a decent person and a person that you do not have to be scared of as president of the United States," McCain said to boos and groans from supporters.
"If you want a fight, we will fight," McCain said. "But we will be respectful. I admire Senator Obama and his accomplishments. ... I don't mean that has to reduce your ferocity; I just mean to say you have to be respectful."
At one point, McCain grabbed the microphone from a woman who had begun to say she didn't like Obama because he is an Arab. "No, ma'am. No, ma'am," McCain said. "He's a decent family man, a citizen who I just happen to have serious differences with on fundamental questions." | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Posts: 262 |
| Posted: | | | | First of all I think McCain did the right thing by trying to reign in some of his more rapid supporters.
But I also would point out that there are plenty of leftwing nuts out there who are just as crazy as those mentioned on the right. There are plenty of sources (articles, photos etc.) I could cite to support this contention but I think most people can acknowledge that much.
-------------------------
Snark,
A thoughtful response - thanks.
On your point about lying and obfuscating - I would point to several things -- Obama's primary debate repsonse that Ayers was just some guy I know from the neighborhood. His claim that he never heard any of the more incendiary remarks Wright made over the years. His unwillingness to discuss his time at Columbia.
In any case I really have serious doubts about Obama beyond just the normal dislike of a political opponent. I hope the American people agree and don't put him in the White House.
Your point about the election is probably at least partially true but when people have developed this almost spiritual connection to some charismatic figure with a thin record and a radical past what other avenue of attack is open to you.
Brian |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Fubar:
There is no proof neded, you need only to know one thing. What is a Marxist and the form of Government as described by Karl Marx. then all you have to do is listen to the words Obama speaks. I knew him for what he is, LONG before I read his book. Now if you do not understand Marxism, then you have some education to attend to.
Why should i waste my time trying to explain something with thought police being active around here. There is nothing that has been posted here by anyone which insults or attacks ANY COMMUNITY member. So if you won't educate yourself, don't ask mee to do it for you.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
|
Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion |
Page:
1... 14 15 16 17 18 ...25 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|