Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,279 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DJ Doena: Quote:
The right tool for the right purpose.
Indeed. If I want to know which titles I own that a person has appeared in I'll use Profiler. If I want to know who somebody I recognise is or all the stuff they've been in I'll use IMDB. It's unlikely Profiler will ever fulfill the latter purpose. So those that want IMDB data in the database should just accept that they can't, and those that don't like IMDB for whatever reason should accept it has other uses. | | | IVS Registered: January 2, 2002 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,279 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting BYATES1: Quote:
Use of the online database is a privilege not a right. You really should define 'use'. Downloading data from the online is not a privilege at all, it's part of the package. Having submissions accepted and your ability to submit if you do not follow the rules are a privilege. | | | IVS Registered: January 2, 2002 |
|
Registered: March 24, 2007 | Posts: 179 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Lithurge: Quote: Quoting BYATES1:
Quote:
Use of the online database is a privilege not a right.
You really should define 'use'.
Downloading data from the online is not a privilege at all, it's part of the package.
Having submissions accepted and your ability to submit if you do not follow the rules are a privilege. Invelos Does not mention the online database on the Home page. The only promotion I really see for it is here on the Why Upgrade page. It is at the bottom. Those of us who have been using it forever often take it for granted. I guess my point is Ken as Invelos does not promote it to sell the program as a sole benefit. The program would still work without the database. Thanks for the response. | | | Brian |
|
Registered: March 24, 2007 | Posts: 179 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting JonM: Quote: Quoting BYATES1:
Quote: If you feel that the legal reasons for not using IMDb data are are stupid or unjustified. Go visit your local government authority or that of the state of Missouri were Invelos is based and get the the law changed. Please do not whine about it in these forums. We in these forums do not own the database Invelos simply allows us to use it at their discretion. The program is great and the community is great. I have noticed that most (not all) of the criticism comes from outside North America. Maybe some of you who want to use IMDb data should get together and contact Ken about buying a franchise of the program to fit within the laws of your country. You can not blame anyone for not wanting to be sued unless you are willing to pay their legal fees. Until that time follow the rules as established or don't contribute.
Use of the online database is a privilege not a right.
I have no intention of using IMdB for contributing (my albeit very few profiles). I've been using Profiler since 2000 and quite frankly, feel insulted by the tone of this and other anti-IMdB threads.
Nobody's whining here, Brian, and I think most people on the forums do understand why they can't use IMdB and don't even want to. Karsten's already been accused of grousing and he never even suggested it should be used as a source. All he did was defend it as a website. But that's a bad thing round here now isn't it?
I am fed up of seeing the steady stream of hate flowing towards IMdB. Several of you imply we'd be better of without it. Rubbish! IMdB is one of the best sites on the net, full stop. I use it daily for the news round-ups, quotes and other stuff. I just avoid the fairly well hidden forums. It's my first stop for every instance that Karsten described of trying to place an actor. Their search methods are brilliant, especially finding shared cast and crew and contrary to what is said, it is broadly accurate. It's very nature means it can't be anything more.
Please everyone, for once and for all, stop waving this crap around like a big stick and speaking to people like they are children. Jon, I never said we would be better off without IMDb as a web site I was just curious after re-reading my post, Where in it did I specifically disparage IMDb? You are correct I did insult members of this community who want the data available and for that I am sorry but I did not take IMDb to task and there is a very specific reason I would not. My wife works for Amazon... Please believe me when I tell you they do not want us using their data. | | | Brian |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 951 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DJ Doena: Quote: Quoting Rifter:
Quote: Having a source with data on 10,000 movies would be really cool, if it was accurate! But what bloody good is 10,000 movies worth of crap? I quit using IMDB years before DVDP even existed because it is more fiction than fact. Last weekend I watched Xena on TV and I was sure I knew that Cesar. So I went to IMDb, looked up the episode and found Karl Urban as Cesar. Of course! Karl Urban -> Éomer from Lord of the Rings. And he played in Pathfinder, too!
That's my usual use case. But what good is it in DVDP when I don't own all 3 titles?
And honestly I don't care if the actor of the 3rd Orc in the 5th row is invented by someone who has entered himself because I wouldn't care about the 3rd Orc in the 5th row in the first place. Like you I use it as a web tool for looking up information on movies not "DVDs". If I want to find out about a new movie that is just out or comming out, plus other info I may want to know about a movie or actor. I'm not concerned about the accuracy or lack there of, for simple web lookups. I use DVD profiler for DVD profiling and have no issue about not being able to use IMDB for the cast and crew and wouldn't want to. DVD Profiler has its purpose and so does IMDB and other entertainment web sites. | | | Are you local? This is a local shop the strangers you would bring would not understand us, our customs, our local ways. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,279 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting BYATES1: Quote:
Invelos Does not mention the online database on the Home page. The only promotion I really see for it is here on the Try the features page: Quote:
DVD Profiler's unique combination of desktop application and online data access sets it apart from competing alternatives.
.....
One-step entry
Just enter the UPC from the DVD case and DVD Profiler does the rest!
Of course the latter is potentially misleading as it won't do the rest if it's not actually in the online database. | | | IVS Registered: January 2, 2002 |
|
Registered: March 24, 2007 | Posts: 179 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Lithurge: Quote: Quoting BYATES1:
Quote:
Invelos Does not mention the online database on the Home page. The only promotion I really see for it is here on the
Try the features page:
Quote:
DVD Profiler's unique combination of desktop application and online data access sets it apart from competing alternatives.
.....
One-step entry
Just enter the UPC from the DVD case and DVD Profiler does the rest!
Of course the latter is potentially misleading as it won't do the rest if it's not actually in the online database. Lithurge, If Ken were to remove all of the data from the online database except The UPC code and the title of the DVD wouldn't what is said on the features page still be true. He could still charge $30 for the program if he wanted. Especially since "rest" is not defined. It would still add the DVD to a collection list. Isn't advertising a funny thing. Thanks for finding the other spot. | | | Brian |
|
| JonM | Registered 28 Dec 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 343 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting BYATES1: Quote:
Jon,
I never said we would be better off without IMDb as a web site
I was just curious after re-reading my post, Where in it did I specifically disparage IMDb? You are correct I did insult members of this community who want the data available and for that I am sorry but I did not take IMDb to task and there is a very specific reason I would not.
My wife works for Amazon...
Please believe me when I tell you they do not want us using their data. And I don't want to use it! My previous post was in "rant mode". You certainly didn't specifically say anything against IMDb as a site; your post was just the end of the long stick I mentioned! Skip was the one who jumped on Karsten and there were passing comments made on another thread. I was railing against the larger situation rather than you. Sorry if came off that way. I suppose I've come to see this community as a whole sort sneering whenever it's mentioned. For a long while it was sarcastically referred to as "the site that shall not be named", which is simply pretentious. You know, it makes sense to me to not use their data; but that's no reflection on them. As others have already said, IMDb has it's place, as does Profiler. | | | Jon "When Mister Safety Catch Is Not On, Mister Crossbow Is Not Your Friend."
|
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,279 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting BYATES1: Quote:
If Ken were to remove all of the data from the online database except The UPC code and the title of the DVD wouldn't what is said on the features page still be true. He could still charge $30 for the program if he wanted. Especially since "rest" is not defined. It would still add the DVD to a collection list. Isn't advertising a funny thing.
Thanks for finding the other spot. Not when (insert appropriate) regulating advertising authority gets involved. They don't just look at the wording but the implication. | | | IVS Registered: January 2, 2002 |
|
Registered: May 10, 2007 | Posts: 153 |
| Posted: | | | | We've already had one hicup due to legalities - lets not let it happen again shall we
I'm with Skip on this one | | | regards rorschach999
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Give a man a match and he'll be warm for an hour... Set him on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. |
|
Registered: March 24, 2007 | Posts: 179 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting JonM: Quote: Quoting BYATES1:
Quote:
Jon,
I never said we would be better off without IMDb as a web site
I was just curious after re-reading my post, Where in it did I specifically disparage IMDb? You are correct I did insult members of this community who want the data available and for that I am sorry but I did not take IMDb to task and there is a very specific reason I would not.
My wife works for Amazon...
Please believe me when I tell you they do not want us using their data.
And I don't want to use it! My previous post was in "rant mode". You certainly didn't specifically say anything against IMDb as a site; your post was just the end of the long stick I mentioned! Skip was the one who jumped on Karsten and there were passing comments made on another thread. I was railing against the larger situation rather than you. Sorry if came off that way.
I suppose I've come to see this community as a whole sort sneering whenever it's mentioned. For a long while it was sarcastically referred to as "the site that shall not be named", which is simply pretentious. You know, it makes sense to me to not use their data; but that's no reflection on them. As others have already said, IMDb has it's place, as does Profiler. Thanks Jon I would love to see some posts in the Forums over at IMDb asking why its not OK to use IMDb data in DVD Profiler. I am just kidding!!! | | | Brian |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting BYATES1: Quote: If Ken were to remove all of the data from the online database except The UPC code and the title of the DVD wouldn't what is said on the features page still be true. He could still charge $30 for the program if he wanted. Especially since "rest" is not defined. It would still add the DVD to a collection list. Isn't advertising a funny thing.
Thanks for finding the other spot. There is mention of it in one other spot that I could find. On the 'Product' page it says: The best way to catalog your DVD addiction, DVD Profiler is built on a dynamic user-contributed database that's always up to date! A database is more than just a UPC and title listing, it has to contain data. The truth of the matter is that Profilers BIGGEST selling point is the online database. People buy this software because they can enter a UPC and get all the information about that DVD. Is the program usable without the db? Sure it is, but I wouldn't spend $30 on it...would you? | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Lithurge: Quote: Quoting DJ Doena:
Quote:
The right tool for the right purpose.
Indeed. If I want to know which titles I own that a person has appeared in I'll use Profiler. If I want to know who somebody I recognise is or all the stuff they've been in I'll use IMDB.
It's unlikely Profiler will ever fulfill the latter purpose.
So those that want IMDB data in the database should just accept that they can't, and those that don't like IMDB for whatever reason should accept it has other uses. Agreed. I use IMDb in the same way all the time. I can't tell you how many times my wife and I are watching something on TV and recognize and actor but don't know where we know him from. IMDb is the best place to find that information. Is it 100% accurate? No, but it has never failed to provide the information I was looking for. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,796 |
| Posted: | | | | I wish you people would give the IMDB v. DVDP a rest, they serve different purposes. Yes there is an intersection of the data they contain. But….Neither will ever be 100% accurate; they’re created and maintained by humans, .who notoriously subject to making errors. Everyday previously accepted historical and scientific facts are proven wrong.
Whether it is a government, a religion, a corporation, bacteria or virus and even a group such the users and builders of the DVD Profiler data base have their primary and under lying and driving force is to survive and prosper regardless what they advertise.
How the DVD Profiler data base is to be built has been stated in the rules and their forth coming update and this forum, enough said give it a rest. If you don't want play by the rules, take DVD collection and go play else where. | | | We don't need stinkin' IMDB's errors, we make our own. Ineptocracy, You got to love it. "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." - Abraham Lincoln |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,279 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Srehtims: Quote: I wish you people would give the IMDB v. DVDP a rest, they serve different purposes.
Well at least four of us agree | | | IVS Registered: January 2, 2002 |
|
Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,475 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting JonM: Quote:
I have no intention of using IMdB for contributing (my albeit very few profiles). I've been using Profiler since 2000 and quite frankly, feel insulted by the tone of this and other anti-IMdB threads.
Nobody's whining here, Brian, and I think most people on the forums do understand why they can't use IMdB and don't even want to. Karsten's already been accused of grousing and he never even suggested it should be used as a source. All he did was defend it as a website. But that's a bad thing round here now isn't it?
I am fed up of seeing the steady stream of hate flowing towards IMdB. Several of you imply we'd be better of without it. Rubbish! IMdB is one of the best sites on the net, full stop. I use it daily for the news round-ups, quotes and other stuff. I just avoid the fairly well hidden forums. It's my first stop for every instance that Karsten described of trying to place an actor. Their search methods are brilliant, especially finding shared cast and crew and contrary to what is said, it is broadly accurate. It's very nature means it can't be anything more.
Please everyone, for once and for all, stop waving this crap around like a big stick and speaking to people like they are children. Thank you for expressing some of my thoughts. I like to read a variety of resources that best serve my needs. I like to study, compare, and research things that interest me - such as DVDs. Anyone can find positive and negative atributes about anything - only by comparison can one accurately assess anything. That said, I try my best to know and follow the Ken & Gerri's "rules". I believe that is true for everyone who puts time and energy into DVDP - otherwise, why would they be wasting their time on this site?!? |
|