Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Thanks for that tidbit of information, tim, I didn't think it had based on what I had seen to date, but i had not tried Achim's specific description...yet. And based on your comment I don't need to now, since it doesn't work. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,738 |
| Posted: | | | | You're welcome! |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | Apparently my common name change of Don Digirolamo to Don DiGirolamo is correct, because my contribution of "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" (15-1) has been approved and released today. In spite of Tim's clear objection in his no vote: Quoting T!M: Quote: Don Digirolamo appears in 27 profiles in my collection, and apart from this, he is NEVER credited with a capital G. So I'd say we use "Don Digirolamo" | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 4,596 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Martin_Zuidervliet: Quote: Apparently my common name change of Don Digirolamo to Don DiGirolamo is correct, because my contribution of "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" (15-1) has been approved and released today. In spite of Tim's clear objection in his no vote All that suggests is that the screeners are human and prone to mistakes as we all are. | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection |
|
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,738 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting 8ballMax: Quote: All that suggests is that the screeners are human and prone to mistakes as we all are. I didn't want to say that... I thought I made a pretty strong case (see my post on the first page of this thread), but with a voting result on the actual contribution of 15 to 1, I'm not exactly surprised at the screeners' decision. I do still feel, however, that the results of this poll are not exactly a guarantee for success if I were to try to change Don's other 26 appearances in my collection to "Don DiGirolamo credited as Don Digirolamo". Somehow I'm convinced that a large chunk of these 26 updates would garner a number of no-votes and be declined. Until I find any more evidence that shows that that Don DiGirolamo actually IS his correct name - more than just one single credit in 'Who Framed Roger Rabbit' - I think I'm going to stick with Don Digirolamo for now, as that's the name he seems to be mostly credited as. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 951 |
| Posted: | | | | The common name should be his most commonly credited as name which does appear to be Don Digirolamo. Which is what we should be using for common names "The most commonly credited as". This trend to use real names, birth names, or the name the person goes by personally as the common name, is only going to create more work in the long run.
Hopefully Ken can roll out the searchable online DB to cut down on some of the questions what the common name should be. | | | Are you local? This is a local shop the strangers you would bring would not understand us, our customs, our local ways. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Tracer: Quote: The common name should be his most commonly credited as name which does appear to be Don Digirolamo. No it doesn't. His most commonly used name is "DON DIGIROLAMO" and with the rule applied, which I mentioned in my first post, his name could be spelled "Don DiGirolamo" and his credit in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" confirms this. | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands | | | Last edited: by Daddy DVD |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 951 |
| Posted: | | | | If your going to use Don DiGirolamo as the common name for the credited as Don Digirolamo then your actually saying he has been credited as Don Digirolamo.
If he is credited as Don DiGirolamo in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" then why would you even need to use a common name Don DiGirolamo?
If your saying DON DIGIROLAMO should be Don DiGirolamo because of the rule for "di" then really again that isn't a common name. That is just a formating the name based on the rules. But, the use of "di" is usually when we have credits like DON DI GIROLAMO we would enter it as Don di Girolamo. Your assumution the "di" would have us enter DON DIGIROLAMO as Don diGirolamo. | | | Are you local? This is a local shop the strangers you would bring would not understand us, our customs, our local ways. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Tracer: Quote: If your going to use Don DiGirolamo as the common name for the credited as Don Digirolamo then your actually saying he has been credited as Don Digirolamo. No, I'm saying his common name is actually something else than the credited as name. Quoting Tracer: Quote: If he is credited as Don DiGirolamo in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" then why would you even need to use a common name Don DiGirolamo? I don't, but he was stored as Don Digirolamo in the previous existing profile. Quoting Tracer: Quote: If your saying DON DIGIROLAMO should be Don DiGirolamo because of the rule for "di" then really again that isn't a common name. That is just a formating the name based on the rules. But, the use of "di" is usually when we have credits like DON DI GIROLAMO we would enter it as Don di Girolamo. Your assumution the "di" would have us enter DON DIGIROLAMO as Don diGirolamo. Whether articles are joined with the last name or are written seperately does not matter. The rule simply tells us to put it in the appropriate name field which is usually the last. And the article "Di" is always capitalized, so writting Don diGirolamo is out of the question. | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 951 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Martin_Zuidervliet: Quote: I don't, but he was stored as Don Digirolamo in the previous existing profile. If you just used the credited as feature to make him Don DiGirolamo as shown in the credits. Then you have established his common name as Don Digirolamo. If your saying his common name is actually Don DiGirolamo you should have never used the common name of Don Digirolamo. This makes no sense if your trying to establish his common name should be Don DiGirolamo. | | | Are you local? This is a local shop the strangers you would bring would not understand us, our customs, our local ways. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Tracer: Quote: Quoting Martin_Zuidervliet:
Quote: I don't, but he was stored as Don Digirolamo in the previous existing profile.
If you just used the credited as feature to make him Don DiGirolamo as shown in the credits. Then you have established his common name as Don Digirolamo. If your saying his common name is actually Don DiGirolamo you should have never used the common name of Don Digirolamo. This makes no sense if your trying to establish his common name should be Don DiGirolamo. I have contributed Don DiGirolamo as his common name by which he is credited in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" so I do not need the credited as feature there. I only need that feature for the movies where he is credited as "DON DIGIROLAMO". | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 951 |
| Posted: | | | | Yes and no if your saying that all film credits DON DIGIROLAMO is really Don DiGirolamo then that is what you should just contribute Don DiGirolamo no need for a common name. The only time you would need to use the credited as feature is if the film credits listed him as Don Digirolamo then you would use Don DiGirolamo as the common name. | | | Are you local? This is a local shop the strangers you would bring would not understand us, our customs, our local ways. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | Movie: DON DiGIROLAMO; Common Name: Don DiGirolamo, Credited As: None Movie: DON DIGIROLAMO; Common Name: Don DiGirolamo, Credited As: Don Digirolamo
That's what I'm saying. | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 951 |
| Posted: | | | | But, why are you bothering to do a credited as Don Digirolamo credited as if the name is in all Caps? You have already established by the rules DI should be Di. If your saying the only time it would be Di is if the credits use a lower case "i" then by looking at the credits he is more commonly credited in all CAPS.
By your reasoning DON DIGIROLAMO equals Don Digirolamo and DON DiGIROLAMO equals Don DiGirolamo. Then the common name should be Don Digirolamo since that is the most commonly credited as.
Your just creating more work for yourself and everyone else if you expect all contributors when they see Movie: DON DIGIROLAMO; Common Name: Don DiGirolamo, Credited As: Don Digirolamo and when they see Movie: DON DiGIROLAMO; Common Name: Don DiGirolamo, Credited As: None | | | Are you local? This is a local shop the strangers you would bring would not understand us, our customs, our local ways. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | Yes it creates more work, but if Don DiGirolamo is his proper spelled name then its that what counts more as a common name than the fact his name is credited more often in all caps (IMO). | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands | | | Last edited: by Daddy DVD |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 951 |
| Posted: | | | | Again the common name has nothing to do with proper spelling or upper and lower case letters, birth name, the name they go by personally. It should only be the most commonly credited as name to allow name linking among the various DVD profiles.
You don't even seen the common name field execpt when your editing a profile or making a contribution. | | | Are you local? This is a local shop the strangers you would bring would not understand us, our customs, our local ways. |
|