Author |
Message |
Registered: April 14, 2007 | Posts: 433 |
| Posted: | | | | Canoscan Lide70 here. I usually scan at 300dpi since a friend in the pre-press business told me that most printed material is done at that resolution. | | | Chris | | | Last edited: by cmaeditor |
|
Registered: March 19, 2007 | Posts: 700 |
| Posted: | | | | I use the CanoScan LiDE 80 its not that expensive and do the work. Cind'a like the extra programs that followed it, espesially the OCR program to do the overview (but that maybe comming with any scanner nowdays?) | | | We are all at the same age, only at different time... |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 4,506 |
| Posted: | | | | I'm using a Trust Easy Connect 19200. | | | Registered: July 7 2000 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | For whatever it's worth, I use an HP4670 scanner, with Adobe Photoshop and Pantone Color Calibration System. I scan at 800DPI, using HP's Software which I save as a Tiff, this minimizes artifacting when I resize. I do all my cleanup and editing in Adobe Photoshop, I then progressively resize the image in stages from it's starting point of approximately 4000 Pixels wide, this also helps to minimize artifacting. My ultimate file size is 800 pixels wide. At this point I save it for my permanent image converting it to JPEG at "NO" compression.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: June 12, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,665 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: ... I then progressively resize the image in stages from it's starting point of approximately 4000 Pixels wide, this also helps to minimize artifacting... I hadn't thought of breaking this up. How many intervals do you use? | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Tweeter:
I step down in 500 pixel intervals.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: June 12, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,665 |
| Posted: | | | | Interesting, i'll have to try that. | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 4,596 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: I then progressively resize the image in stages from it's starting point of approximately 4000 Pixels wide, this also helps to minimize artifacting. My ultimate file size is 800 pixels wide. At this point I save it for my permanent image converting it to JPEG at "NO" compression.
Skip If your original source is an uncompressed lossless format, tiff, why would you need to progressively resize the image to minimize artifacting? Artifacting only occurs when working with compressed formats such as jpeg | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection |
|
Registered: March 10, 2007 | Posts: 4,282 |
| Posted: | | | | Artifacting (although a different type of artifacting) also occurs with resample operations such as a resize down, as in this case. Depending on the resample algorithm, the artifacting can be quite bad. Personally, I've found that doing a two-stage resample yields excellent results, resizing down to double the destination size first, then once more to the final resolution. I'll have to give Skip's method a go to see if the extra steps result in better quality for me. | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Representative | | | Last edited: by Ken Cole |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting 8ballMax: Quote: Quoting skipnet50:Quote: I then progressively resize the image in stages from it's starting point of approximately 4000 Pixels wide, this also helps to minimize artifacting. My ultimate file size is 800 pixels wide. At this point I save it for my permanent image converting it to JPEG at "NO" compression.
Skip
If your original source is an uncompressed lossless format, tiff, why would you need to progressively resize the image to minimize artifacting? Artifacting only occurs when working with compressed formats such as jpeg Playing it safe, 8Ball, really that simple. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 4,596 |
| Posted: | | | | May give your method a try ;. | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection |
|
Registered: March 17, 2007 | Posts: 175 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: For whatever it's worth, I use an HP4670 scanner, with Adobe Photoshop and Pantone Color Calibration System. I scan at 800DPI, using HP's Software which I save as a Tiff, this minimizes artifacting when I resize. I do all my cleanup and editing in Adobe Photoshop, I then progressively resize the image in stages from it's starting point of approximately 4000 Pixels wide, this also helps to minimize artifacting. My ultimate file size is 800 pixels wide. At this point I save it for my permanent image converting it to JPEG at "NO" compression.
Skip I'll have to give that a shot as well. Though Photshop is a little rich for my blood. I alternate between Paint.net or Gimp, whichever my mood is at the time. | | | Gotta nip it in the bud, Andy! |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | As I always have, as well, anyone who wants my file images just drop me a note and I will be more than happy to send them out to you.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,380 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting mlr: Quote: I have a hp psc 2410 photosmart & CanoScan 4400F I have also that photosmart and use it on my scans, but its really bad with bright red (at least mine is). |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,436 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Overseer: Quote: I'll have to give that a shot as well. Though Photshop is a little rich for my blood. I alternate between Paint.net or Gimp, whichever my mood is at the time. I'll have to take a look at Paint.net, have not seen that before... PhotoFiltre is another free one, which I use for the removing dist and and other disturbances... It's free too and much simpler to use than Gimp... | | | Achim [諾亞信; Ya-Shin//Nuo], a German in Taiwan. Registered: May 29, 2000 (at InterVocative) |
|
| mlr | HearAnyGoodStoriesLately? |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 173 |
| Posted: | | | | "...but its really bad with bright red ..." Yes, used to correct it in ACDSee Editor but the main reason for replacing it was that the HP’s glass got cloudy\dirty and there was no way I could open it to clean the bottom.
Went on a hunt for a removable glass scanner with no luck so in the end got a Cannon because the ‘support’ guy wasn’t snooty or rude like HP & Epson or Microtek who didn’t even bother to respond to my email… | | | Last edited: by mlr |
|