|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 ...16 Previous Next
|
Prop 8 (Locked) |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Rico: Quote: Anyone who would vote YES care to share reasoning why?
I've been married to the same woman for 29 years & am no way threatened by gays choosing to marry.
Rick What makes you think that someone who votes yes is "threatened"? | | | Hal |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,217 |
| Posted: | | | | A clear 'No' to Prop. 8 I see absolutely no reason why homosexual couples shouldn't mary, but a lot of reasons why they should be able to. Quoting Unicus69: Quote: The proponents of Prop 8 claim they want to 'protect marriage'. Seeing as 50% percent of first marriages, 67% of second and 74% of third marriages end in divorce, what exactly are they protecting? Very good point. Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote: Marriage in church will be quite unlikely though, no matter which side will win. There are a lot of churches that do wed same-sex couples, and why shouldn't they? If to people, who believe in God, want to be together it's obviously Gods will that they do so. As for children, well the lesbians are in advantage at that point. They have the neccesarry equipment onboard, so they "just" need a male sperm-donor. Not to forget that "to women living together" are, by most people, seen less of a thread than to guys. But the whole teasing thing doesn't hold water IMHO, children can be cruel to other children over a myriad things: mother/father is poor, mother/father is fat, mother/father has the wrong skin colour etc. pp. so gay parents would just add one point more. cya, Mithi | | | Mithi's little XSLT tinkering - the power of XML --- DVD-Profiler Mini-Wiki | | | Last edited: by Mithi |
| Registered: April 8, 2007 | Posts: 1,057 |
| Posted: | | | | Quote: Hal wrote: This is simply the result of the ever expanding liberal agenda and removal of God from our lives through the media, especially movies and television to brainwash our society into thinking that it is wrong to be judgmental of other people no matter what they do. It's funny that you politicize 'gay marriage' as a liberal agenda. Is it part of the conservative credo, manifesto, or true conservatives, to oppose gay marriage???? Rick | | | If I felt any better I'd be sick! Envy is mental theft. If you covet another mans possessions, then you should be willing to take on his responsibilities, heartaches, and troubles, along with his money. D. Koontz |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 630 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: The question is, when will California (or Massachusetts) eliminate the ban on bigamy? Or parents marrying their own children? Or brothers and sisters marrying? Or polygamy?
There are reasons why these things have been overwhelmingly frowned upon (and illegal) for thousands of years, but somehow, we are now "more enlightened"?
The law against bigamy is just the majority bullying the minority (mainly, some cultures allowing begami have in history been rather opressing towards women, and that part is obviously not desirable in a free society). The laws against marriage to close family is based in medical reasoning (potential children getting health related problems). Quote:
This is simply the result of the ever expanding liberal agenda and removal of God from our lives through the media, especially movies and television to brainwash our society into thinking that it is wrong to be judgmental of other people no matter what they do.
And why exactly is it other people should live by some random rules some guys wrote a few thousand years ago in a book you now consider holy? And yes, I recognize you fully have the right to consider that book holy - just as everyone else have the right to consider the book fiction if they so choose. Quote:
It's callled relativism, and is the path we are far down already.
Don't worry, like the population in other countries ahead of you in this development you will over time realize that discrimination based on sexual orientation is just as pathetic as discrimination based on race. Quote:
Just as with children, societies have to have boundaries. Sadly those boundaries are disappearing. Our civilization will not be not far behind! Yes, boundaries are needed. But what are the purpose of the boundaries? To limit the individual or to balance the freedom given to individuals. We all know the saying "Your freedom ends where mine begins". The boundaries (laws) are there to determine where those rights meets. Allowing gay marriage grant rights to homosexuals but do not take away any freedom or rights of heterosexuals - so what exactly is the problem? | | | Regards Lars | | | Last edited: by lmoelleb |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: What makes you think that someone who votes yes is "threatened"? Maybe, just maybe, because that is the party line? I mean the 'Yes on 8' website is located at 'www.protectmarriage.com'. You don't need to protect something unless you believe it is being threatened in some way. While this may not apply to you, it is the general opinion held by Prop 8 proponents. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
| Registered: April 8, 2007 | Posts: 1,057 |
| Posted: | | | | Quote: Quoting Ric o: Quote: Anyone who would vote YES care to share reasoning why? I've been married to the same woman for 29 years & am no way threatened by gays choosing to marry. Rick What makes you think that someone who votes yes is "threatened"? I'm simply stating I'm not threatened. You've read more into that statement, than there is! I do not know if 'someone' who votes YES is threatened. That's why I asked if YES voter would care to share there reasoning. | | | If I felt any better I'd be sick! Envy is mental theft. If you covet another mans possessions, then you should be willing to take on his responsibilities, heartaches, and troubles, along with his money. D. Koontz |
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,917 |
| Posted: | | | | How does gay marriage affect anyone? If two men or two women get married, will that really affect anyone's life in a fundamentally negative way?
No.
The worse that can happen is someone gets butthurt because they see something that's different from what they believe.
I'm 100% straight and I don't care if two men or two women get married.
Live and let live. | | | Last edited: by Dr. Killpatient |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,217 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: The question is, when will California (or Massachusetts) eliminate the ban on bigamy? Or parents marrying their own children? Or brothers and sisters marrying? Or polygamy?
There are reasons why these things have been overwhelmingly frowned upon (and illegal) for thousands of years, but somehow, we are now "more enlightened" And would you be so kind as to tell us some of those reason? But no bible-hogwash please, real reasons. And don't come with the lame: "Close related people have handicapped childs" because marriage doesn't necessarily means "offsprings". cya, Mithi | | | Mithi's little XSLT tinkering - the power of XML --- DVD-Profiler Mini-Wiki |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 630 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Mithi: Quote: But the whole teasing thing doesn't hold water IMHO, children can be cruel to other children over a myriad things: mother/father is poor, mother/father is fat, mother/father has the wrong skin colour etc. pp. so gay parents would just add one point more.
cya, Mithi Just to clarify: I did not use the teasing example because I think it is a valid reason to make it impossible for adoptions in same sex mariages. I just tried to clarify that I do recognize that once children are involved it is no longer a simple question of two concenting adults - it is a question of two concenting adults and a child. Hence I do recognize it is valid to discuss if adoptions should be allowed, as the rights of the child are protected by the state (and hence all of us). I do not have any knowledge about the psycological effects of a child living in a family with a same-sex marriage. While I do think it obviously should not be a problem, I recognize that people with more knowledge on this area than me might have a valid reason to argue against adoption (I don't care about what religious people say, I am thinking of actual professionel people here). Remember in an adoption, only one thing matters: what is best for the child. I can see this wasn't clear enough in my original post, sorry. | | | Regards Lars | | | Last edited: by lmoelleb |
| Registered: March 17, 2007 | Posts: 853 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Rico: Quote:
Quote: Hal wrote: This is simply the result of the ever expanding liberal agenda and removal of God from our lives through the media, especially movies and television to brainwash our society into thinking that it is wrong to be judgmental of other people no matter what they do.
It's funny that you politicize 'gay marriage' as a liberal agenda. Is it part of the conservative credo, manifesto, or true conservatives, to oppose gay marriage????
Rick Actually yes it is. True conservatism includes homosexuality is wrong due to the fact that most conservatives are also very religious. Remember I did not say all so please do not jump in and say you are a conservative and disagree. It also includes the right to life belief and they generally rail against pornography as well. I am not a conservative as I disagree with part of the part line. I am a Republican in the spirit as it was designed when joined be Abraham Lincoln. |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 630 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Mithi: Quote: ... And don't come with the lame: "Close related people have handicapped childs" because marriage doesn't necessarily means "offsprings". ...
cya, Mithi I did consider adding "but today this obviously only matters if the couple do have children" in my post but I tried to keep it short instead. Guess I'll have to go for the long version including all the exceptions in the future. | | | Regards Lars | | | Last edited: by lmoelleb |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 630 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Lord Of The Sith: Quote:
Actually yes it is. True conservatism includes homosexuality is wrong due to the fact that most conservatives are also very religious. Remember I did not say all so please do not jump in and say you are a conservative and disagree. It also includes the right to life belief and they generally rail against pornography as well. I am not a conservative as I disagree with part of the part line. I am a Republican in the spirit as it was designed when joined be Abraham Lincoln. You guys (assuming you are from the US) really need more than two political parties. As it is now, people that are for example against universal health care but for same-sex marriages might end up schizophrenic. | | | Regards Lars |
| Registered: April 8, 2007 | Posts: 1,057 |
| Posted: | | | | Lord - Thanks for the honesty!
Well it's time for my walk & count the signs.
Rick | | | If I felt any better I'd be sick! Envy is mental theft. If you covet another mans possessions, then you should be willing to take on his responsibilities, heartaches, and troubles, along with his money. D. Koontz |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,480 |
| Posted: | | | | The following is a list of faith-based organizations which oppose Prop. 8: Quote: Affirming Spirits of the First Congregational United Church of Christ All Saints Episcopal Church Altadena Community Church United Church of Christ Apple Seed Friends Meeting Berkeley Fellowship Unitarian Universalists Beth Chayim Chadashim (BCC) Beth El Congregation Bloom in the Desert Ministries UCC/Methodist Board of Rabbis of Southern California Board of Trustees, Unitarian Universalist Church of Ventura California Church IMPACT Call to Action / USA Catholic Democrats of California California Faith for Equality Christ Chapel Metropolitan Community Church Church of the Foothills Claremont United Methodist Church Clergy and Laity for Economic Justice Santa Barbara Clergy United, Inc. Community Church of Atascadero, UCC Conejo Valley Unitarian Universalist Fellowship Congregation Beth El Congregation Church of Belmont UCC Congregation Kol Ami Council of Churches of Santa Clara County The Episcopal Diocese of California Fair Oaks United Methodist Church First Congregational Church, Riverside First Presbyterian Church of Palo Alto First Unitarian-Universalist Church of San Diego Golden Gate Association of the Northern California Nevada Conference of the United Church of Christ Hollywood Lutheran Church Immanuel Presbyterian Church Institute for Judaism and Sexual Orientation Interfaith Clergy Coalition Irvine United Congregational Church, UCC Jewish Community Relations Council SF, the Peninsula, Marin, Sonoma, Alameda and Contra Costa Counties Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles LGBTQI Interfaith Clergy Council of Los Angeles Lutherans Concerned – Los Angeles Lutherans Concerned – North America Metropolitan Community Church of the Coachella Valley Metropolitan Community Church Los Angeles Metropolitan Community Church – Region 6 Metropolitan Community Church in the Valley Ministry in Action Commission, St. Mark’s United Methodist Church Mira Vista United Church of Christ Mission Hills United Church of Christ Mormons for Marriage Mount Diablo Unitarian Universalist Church Orange Coast Unitarian Universalist Church Pacific Association of Reform Rabbis Pacific Central District of the Unitarian Universalist Association Pacific School of Religion Pacific Southwest District, Unitarian Universalist Association Palomar Unitarian Universalist Fellowship Progressive Jewish Alliance Redlands United Church of Christ Region One Metropolitan Community Church Sacramento Call to Action Saint Aidan’s Episcopal Church Saint Paul Lutheran Church San Marino Congressional UCC Sepulveda Unitarian Universalist Society Social Justice Committee, Unitarian Society of Santa Barbara Starr King Unitarian Universalist Church St. Gregory of Nyssa Episcopal Church St. John’s Presbyterian Church St. Luke’s Episcopal Church St. Matthew’s Lutheran Church Stone Church of Willow Glen Temple Isaiah The Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies in Religion The Episcopal Church of St. John the Evangelist The Metropolitan Community Church of San Diego The Southern California Nevada Conference of the United Church of Christ The Workmen’s Circle – Arbeter Ring Union for Reform Judaism – Pacific Southwest Council Union for Reform Judaism – Pacific Central West Council Unitarian Universalist Church in Anaheim Unitarian Universalist Church of Berkeley Unitarian Universalist Church of Davis Unitarian Universalist Church of Fresno Unitarian Universalist Church of Long Beach Unitarian Universalist Church of Palo Alto Unitarian Universalist Church of Santa Monica Unitarian Universalist Church of Ventura Unitarian Universalist Community of the Mountains Unitarian Universalist Community Church – Sacramento Unitarian Universalist Congregation, Santa Rosa Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Los Gatos Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of San Dieguito Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Stanislaus County Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Tuolmne County Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Visalia Unitarian Universalist Laguna Beach – Board of Trustees Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry Action Network Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry, CA Unitarian Universalist of Santa Clarita Valley Unitarian Universalist Society of Sacramento Valley Ministries MCC
| | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 4,596 |
| Posted: | | | | I'm voting a resounding YES because of MY religious beliefs and NOT because of any "party Line". If anyone can't accept THAT then there's nothing more to be said. | | | My WebGenDVD online Collection |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,692 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: The question is, when will California (or Massachusetts) eliminate the ban on bigamy? Or parents marrying their own children? Or brothers and sisters marrying? Or polygamy?
There are reasons why these things have been overwhelmingly frowned upon (and illegal) for thousands of years, but somehow, we are now "more enlightened"?
This is simply the result of the ever expanding liberal agenda and removal of God from our lives through the media, especially movies and television to brainwash our society into thinking that it is wrong to be judgmental of other people no matter what they do. It's callled relativism, and is the path we are far down already.
Just as with children, societies have to have boundaries. Sadly those boundaries are disappearing. Our civilization will not be not far behind! I'm a little confused why any of this has any relevance to gays wanting to be married? And I would vote No. I see no reason why anyone should be discriminated against. If they wish ti be blessed by God why should they be stopped? | | | Paul | | | Last edited: by pauls42 |
|
|
Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 ...16 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|