| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 1, 2009 |  Posts: 8 |
| | Posted: | | | | Kathy: that link gives me "You are not authorized to view this page."
Hoops, jump through, make me? |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting quog: Quote:
I am pointing out something that would make the whole process better. Allow me to disagree here. It wouldn't make the process any better, it would simply remove the need to document your data. As a side-effect the main-database would be flooded again with incorrect (but well-meant) data from some obscure sources. The requirement for documentation has been implemented exactly for this reason. We (the contributing members of this forum) are still cleaning out the mess the complete lack of documentation left us with. Again: If you don't want to play to the rules: Play at home. If you accept the rules: You are welcome in our asylum. | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,475 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting quog: Quote:
Kathy: that link gives me "You are not authorized to view this page."
Hoops, jump through, make me? Sorry, I posted the opening page but you need to have joined to access that link. Look on the forums page under "DVD Profiler": http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx. Edit: There is a "request access" button to tick. Sometimes it takes a little time to get accepted. | | | | Last edited: by Kathy |
|
| Registered: March 10, 2009 | | Posts: 2,248 |
| | Posted: | | | | Simply put if you did not want to contribute it to the online database, you don't not have to. If you do you take on the responsibility that it entails. That responsibility is to confirm your sources for where you obtained your information.
That is not up for debate that is the rules. Unless your just to lazy to abide by them. | | | | Last edited: by ShinyDiscGuy |
|
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 4,479 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting VirtualScot: Quote:
That is not up for debate that is the rules. Unless your just too lazy to abide by them. The problem is not to be lazy. When you contribute, you give other users the opportunity to download the data you contributed. Probably most users will consider those data as correct. Unfortunately, rules, as they are written, ask to modify correct data to wrong data (specially names when all caps credits are converted to mixed case). Personally, I would hate to have to mess other users' databases, and prefer not to contribute per the rules when it is forbidden to contribute correct data. Not a problem of being lazy or not... | | | | Images from movies | | | | Last edited: by surfeur51 |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,005 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting quog: Quote:
dee1959jay: Let me spell it out for you. I used a piece of software to choose a (close) match to my dvd. I edited that profile to match my DVD. Whereby you changed the UPC/DiscID and thus creating a complete new profile. And expecting DVDProfiler to track all the changes you do, it would result in a lot of additional information to be saved in the database and it would just get too much. Why is it too much for you to write in your contribution notes, that you got your credit information from the US profile on which you based your new profile? | | | 
 |
|
| Registered: March 10, 2009 | | Posts: 2,248 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting surfeur51: Quote:
Quoting VirtualScot:
Quote:
That is not up for debate that is the rules. Unless your just too lazy to abide by them.
The problem is not to be lazy. When you contribute, you give other users the opportunity to download the data you contributed. Probably most users will consider those data as correct. Unfortunately, rules, as they are written, ask to modify correct data to wrong data (specially names when all caps credits are converted to mixed case).
Personally, I would hate to have to mess other users' databases, and prefer not to contribute per the rules when it is forbidden to contribute correct data. Not a problem of being lazy or not... Thanks for giving me even more reason not to contribute online  |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 5,494 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting dee1959jay: Quote:
CubbyUps is right. Just try and resubmit with something in your Contribution Notes along the lines of what he suggested. That should work. +1 I have never had a profile rejected when I clone it from another copy in the data base as LONG as you put down what profile you took it from .. i.e. UPC usually works .... | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
|
| Registered: May 9, 2007 |  Posts: 1,536 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting quog: Quote:
I am not stupid - I know what you are all saying. I have in fact re-submitted the profile with details of where the cast/crew came from. I am pointing out something that would make the whole process better. What would make the process better, is if the DVD information would somehow be seaprated from the (re-usable) movie information, such as cast/crew, production year, studios. But that is an old change request, and there are no signs we are moving in that direction. | | | | Hans |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 6,730 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Staid S Barr: Quote:
What would make the process better, is if the DVD information would somehow be seaprated from the (re-usable) movie information, such as cast/crew, production year, studios. Agreed. | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up!
But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 |  Posts: 2,337 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Silence_of_Lambs: Quote:
Quoting Staid S Barr:
Quote:
What would make the process better, is if the DVD information would somehow be seaprated from the (re-usable) movie information, such as cast/crew, production year, studios.
Agreed. That would make the whole program times ten better, but sadly Ken has never responded to that feature request  |
|
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 4,479 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Staid S Barr: Quote:
What would make the process better, is if the DVD information would somehow be seaprated from the (re-usable) movie information, such as cast/crew, production year, studios. But that is an old change request, and there are no signs we are moving in that direction. There is no need for a change of the program. Just use real information instead of DVD information with Invelos rules for movies (specially titles and names), and most problems will automatically disappear. | | | | Images from movies | | | | Last edited: by surfeur51 |
|