Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,380 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Again, how many of those were internal wars vs. wars against other countries? Apart from the invasions pretty much all were between countries. Greece civil war is debatable, but it had US and UK involved so id say it had elements of war against other countries. | | | Last edited: by whispering |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,242 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DJ Doena: Quote: The EU parliament is a toothless paper tiger. They can't decide squat. The real power lies within the EU Commission and we can't vote on them. I'm glad I'm not the only one who knows where the real power lies in Brussels. But as I was saying earlier, they will now try to find a way to bring it in through the back door, the French PM has already hinted as much during his Press Speach when he meet with Prsident Bush today. Steve |
|
Registered: March 28, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,299 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: Sustained peace?
I think you've pretty much had peace in Europe since the end of the second world war.
Just exactly how has the EU contributed to that in just the last few years? Was there a European war that has been averted that I am unaware of? I'm not necessarily talking about the last few years. I'm talking about the general potential of the EU to, through economic and political integration among countries, act as a general stabiliizer. KM | | | Tags, tags, bo bags, banana fana fo fags, mi my mo mags, TAGS! Dolly's not alone. You can also clone profiles. You've got questions? You've got answers? Take the DVD Profiler Wiki for a spin. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Daddy DVD: Quote: I'm not against Ireland but I am oppossed to referenda. Vital issues should be the responsibility of the government not of the people. They aren't well informed and only make decisions based on gut feelings. That is a very scary statement there! | | | Hal |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting snarbo: Quote: Quoting Daddy DVD:
Quote: I'm not against Ireland but I am oppossed to referenda. Vital issues should be the responsibility of the government not of the people. They aren't well informed and only make decisions based on gut feelings.
As opposed to Politicians who are doing it for what they can get in brides and expenses for them selves. Governments are voted in and out of office. Brussels is Not. That maybe true but our governments are elected to accept or reject the new europeans laws made in Brussels and so they should. I don't to choose them to be bothered with questions I can not give a decent answer to. | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | this is what the Irish said NO to: Treaty of Lisbon: Quote: Its main objectives are to make the EU more democratic, meeting the European citizens’ expectations for high standards of accountability, openness, transparency and participation; and to make the EU more efficient and able to tackle today's global challenges such as climate change, security and sustainable development. in shortin detail | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | Last edited: by ? |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,380 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DJ Doena: Quote: The EU parliament is a toothless paper tiger. They can't decide squat. The real power lies within the EU Commission and we can't vote on them. They monitor EU Comission and AFAIK can reject legislations. And can break the Comission if needed. Also the Lisbon Treaty would increase the parliaments power. BUT some of us smaller countries could also lose power. | | | Last edited: by whispering |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,744 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting whispering: Quote: BUT some of us smaller countries could also lose power. If that were the only reason, then why would I - being a german citizen - be against it? | | | Karsten DVD Collectors Online
|
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting whispering: Quote: BUT some of us smaller countries could also lose power. Which, if I read the stories correctly, is one of the reasons Ireland rejected the treaty. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,380 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Which, if I read the stories correctly, is one of the reasons Ireland rejected the treaty. The opposition claimed that Irland would lose all power, and a totalitarian EU would force all laws it sees fit on Ireland. Without the Irish having any say, which really isnt the case. But all in all, i'm hoping that the Irish No vote will force them to rewrite the thing to something that is actually possible to read and understand by the average joey. This should never happen in votings, what it did (in my eyes) is that the majority voted by heart not by logic. Also i dont believe the Lisbon Treaty is the best thing ever, i only see it as a step forward, that we as a united europe must take at some point. I also have much respect for the people that do oppose the treaty. E.g. without people like that, that stand up and challenge the treaty it would never work. Parliamentarism doesnt work without the opposition. But lies should never be a tool used, unfortunately in politics thats asking the impossible Quoting snarbo: Quote: We here in the UK are in the same boat. The labour party promised the people a referendum on the Europe issue as part of their elction pledge, now they are in power they are refusing to hold to the promise as they know it will result in "NO". If they promised a referendum, they should give a referendum. We had a similar case in a compleatly diffrent issue. I believe politicians should be held accountable for election promises. | | | Last edited: by whispering |
|
Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting snarbo: Quote: Quoting DJ Doena:
Quote: The EU parliament is a toothless paper tiger. They can't decide squat. The real power lies within the EU Commission and we can't vote on them.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who knows where the real power lies in Brussels.
I'm sorry, but the REAL power in Brussels is in many ways not the European Commission, but the European Council, i.e. the NATIONAL governments, that are in turn controlled by their own national parliaments. This is why European policy-making largely comes down to wheeling and dealing between national governments. It's the national parliaments' fault that they do not adequately control what's going on in this process. You guys still seem to be thinking along the lines of a federalist approach, which was in fact abandoned after the 1992 Maastricht Treaty. You can't have it both ways: either you choose for an inter-governmental approach, which is what we largely have now, and then democratic control rests with the national parliaments and you have a relatively powerless European Commission and European Parliament, or you choose for a federalist approach, and then you'd have less power for national governments and parliaments and more for the European Commission, which in that case of course should be controlled by a strong European Parliament. | | | Last edited: by dee1959jay |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | From the outside looking in, it seems like Europe is trying to form "a more perfect Union." A 'United States of Europe' if you will. It is an admirable goal, but it will be difficult to do if each country doesn't have an equal say in how thing are done.
From what little I have read, it does sound like the bigger countries will have more say. It may not be to the degree that the opposition in Ireland claimed, but any amount of disparagement is going to cause problems. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | @ Unicus: The reason to try and devise a new treaty, constitution or whatever it's called is this. The current procedures for decision-making etc. were devised for a situation where the EU had 15 member states. We now have 27, which makes the "wheeling and dealing" between national governments that I mentioned in my earlier post much more difficult. Also a body such as the European Commission has grown too large to work in a practical way: each member state has a commissioner. This was one of the things the treaty that was voted down by the Irish was to change. Some "stop gaps" were agreed in the 2001 Nice treaty, which e.g. regulated the relative voting weights of the new EU member states, but a more fundamental revision of decision-making procedures remains necessary. That's where different countries have different interests - that's why it's so difficult to reach agreement on these revisions. You can argue: each country should have equal say. On the other hand, you can also argue: why should Malta with a population of 400,000 have equal say with Germany with a population of 80,000,000. | | | Last edited: by dee1959jay |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 96 |
| Posted: | | | | sad thread makes me sad read the paper! eu ftw! |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 315 |
| Posted: | | | | I won't really be getting into this one, and I was even reluctant to write this, as I assume I might be a little too opinionated on this particular matter, due to my personal history. But, since our American friends didn't saw much coverage of the subject I though I'd leave here just one of several examples of how much "informative" and "unbiased" the NO campaign was: This is taking advantage of the average Joe's ignorance on the text of the treaty (and laziness to try and know better) to make up all kinds of lies using primary fears just to get votes. | | | With every passing hour our solar system comes forty-three thousand miles closer to globular cluster M13 in the constellation Hercules, and still there are some misfits who continue to insist that there is no such thing as progress. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,744 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Skywatcher: Quote:
This is taking advantage of the average Joe's ignorance on the text of the treaty (and laziness to try and know better) to make up all kinds of lies using primary fears just to get votes. The message of the poster os of course a lie, but just because some people have their own weird agenda doesn't mean that none of the NO voters had a valid reason to do so. And speaking of Joe Sixpack: Why should he read something that even most politicians declaredly haven't read either or only the CliffsNotes editon? | | | Karsten DVD Collectors Online
|
|