Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion Page: 1... 7 8 9 10  Previous   Next
Headshot Addictions
Author Message
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile Registrantpauls42
Reg: 31/01/2003
Registered: March 13, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 2,692
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
2 1/2 mins from mirror 1..

Of course then the restore comparing headshots took 1 1/2 hrs plus (estimate)


It looks like Simon Cowell has the wrong headshot..
Paul
 Last edited: by pauls42
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorsnarbo
Registered: March 13, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 1,242
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting pauls42:
Quote:
2 1/2 mins from mirror 1..

Of course then the restore comparing headshots took 1 1/2 hrs plus (estimate)


It looks like Simon Cowell has the wrong headshot..



What they put a head on him?

Steve
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorJykke
Registered: March 13, 2007
Finland Posts: 413
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting pauls42:
Quote:
It looks like Simon Cowell has the wrong headshot..


Only today I read in the newspaper about how he smoke too much and have cholesterol and blood pressure problems. There was nothing about sex change... 
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorJuoquim
AKA Archangel of Overkill
Registered: March 22, 2007
United States Posts: 95
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting snarbo:
Quote:


Have found some of the pics I have are better quality perhaps I can resend for a re-evaluation Juoquim?
Will let things settle first other users might find the same.

Steve


Please do!  But, let's try and get the Master cleaned up a bit first.  I'll still accept updates.  They just won't go in until we have V2 released.
Juoquim

Kansas City Flying Disc Club - Disc Golf's KC Home
addicted2dvd's TV Ep Guides
DVDP Resource Centre
My Collection
DVD collector's Dream!!!
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorJuoquim
AKA Archangel of Overkill
Registered: March 22, 2007
United States Posts: 95
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I have a new topic started that I've asked to be pinned to track the activities associated with the Headshot Master.  It is:

Headshot Master Database

Come on over!
Juoquim

Kansas City Flying Disc Club - Disc Golf's KC Home
addicted2dvd's TV Ep Guides
DVDP Resource Centre
My Collection
DVD collector's Dream!!!
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorStaid S Barr
Registered: Oct 16, 2003
Registered: May 9, 2007
Netherlands Posts: 1,536
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
I used the Name Variants plugin and found quite a number of unnecessary BY's (John Cleese, Tom Hanks) just by comparing people that are both in cast and crew. I also spotted many more (Ann-Margret, Fairuza Balk, Drew Barrymore, Billy Crystal, Jamie Lee Curtis, Robert de Niro, Cameron Diaz, Erika Eleniak, Stephen Fry, John Goodman, Jane Horrocks, Shirley Jones, Kevin Kline, Jane Leeves, John Lithgow) after the picture update, just by random checking. I am sure only a few of these were in my data before the pictures update (including almost everybody on The '70s Show).

Most ridiculous is Harrison Ford, who got a birth year of 1884, but the right picture...

On the other hand, the NV plugin has already shown me several cases where a BY would actually help distinguish actors with the same name (Kenny Baker, Matthew Beard, Erin M. Gray, John Howard, Michael Jackson, Peter Kent).
Hans
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorJuoquim
AKA Archangel of Overkill
Registered: March 22, 2007
United States Posts: 95
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Staid S Barr:
Quote:


Most ridiculous is Harrison Ford, who got a birth year of 1884, but the right picture...



Actually, there is a Harrison Ford that was an actor in several silent films born in 1884.  The picture should have been a painted portait.  You probably did not accept that pic when you did the restore.  I think that was one of the errors I listed in that huge post of mine announcing the Master.  I would go through the restore again and accept the painted portrait to make sure you have it correct.
Juoquim

Kansas City Flying Disc Club - Disc Golf's KC Home
addicted2dvd's TV Ep Guides
DVDP Resource Centre
My Collection
DVD collector's Dream!!!
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorStaid S Barr
Registered: Oct 16, 2003
Registered: May 9, 2007
Netherlands Posts: 1,536
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
I don't think so, the Harrison Ford I want is not the one from 1884, so I'll keep the present picture.
But you are right, I probably did not accept this, so the wrong date must have come from somewhere else. Or would the date be copied even if the picture isn't? After all, this is a cast/crew update, not a picture update.
Hans
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorJuoquim
AKA Archangel of Overkill
Registered: March 22, 2007
United States Posts: 95
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
There's a disconnect somewhere.  When Harrison got separated out, maybe you either have the StarWars cast locked, or you didn't receive the update with the corrected linkage.  Until it sorts itself out, I suppose you're best off keeping it like you have it.
Juoquim

Kansas City Flying Disc Club - Disc Golf's KC Home
addicted2dvd's TV Ep Guides
DVDP Resource Centre
My Collection
DVD collector's Dream!!!
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorJuoquim
AKA Archangel of Overkill
Registered: March 22, 2007
United States Posts: 95
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Actually, I just checked it out myself.  It looks like the Harrison Ford that was originally in the Star Wars movies was appropriated for the Silent Film actor.  I will send an update to the Star Wars films later to get the correct Harrison Ford linked to them.
Juoquim

Kansas City Flying Disc Club - Disc Golf's KC Home
addicted2dvd's TV Ep Guides
DVDP Resource Centre
My Collection
DVD collector's Dream!!!
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorStaid S Barr
Registered: Oct 16, 2003
Registered: May 9, 2007
Netherlands Posts: 1,536
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
This is going to be interesting when the use of BY will be "released". Personally, I would prefer that a BY imported by an update does not get extended to other instances of the "same" actor in the database. I would manually decide (using the NV plugin) whether to merge or decide they are distinct.
Hans
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorStaid S Barr
Registered: Oct 16, 2003
Registered: May 9, 2007
Netherlands Posts: 1,536
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
I did an experiment with a peculiar result. I had removed "1884" from Harrison Ford and checked in Indiana Jones and Star Wars that this was now correct (with my orginal picture).
Then I uploaded the headshot database again, with the setting to keep all existing pictures. As expected, I got no questions to keep or replace.
When I checked Harrison Ford, the 1884 reference is back. Same for several others that I removed (John Cleese etc.). This behavior makes it difficult to use the BY even for its intended purpose, unless both instances have a BY attached, I guess.
Hans
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile Registrantpauls42
Reg: 31/01/2003
Registered: March 13, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 2,692
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Staid S Barr:
Quote:
I did an experiment with a peculiar result. I had removed "1884" from Harrison Ford and checked in Indiana Jones and Star Wars that this was now correct (with my orginal picture).
Then I uploaded the headshot database again, with the setting to keep all existing pictures. As expected, I got no questions to keep or replace.
When I checked Harrison Ford, the 1884 reference is back. Same for several others that I removed (John Cleese etc.). This behavior makes it difficult to use the BY even for its intended purpose, unless both instances have a BY attached, I guess.


I believe this is deliberate by the software (as mentioned by Ken in a very early post). And in order to separate you will need BY on both..
Paul
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorStaid S Barr
Registered: Oct 16, 2003
Registered: May 9, 2007
Netherlands Posts: 1,536
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
So this would actually induce me to add a BY, where many people voice the opinion to stay away from these for the moment.
Hans
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorJuoquim
AKA Archangel of Overkill
Registered: March 22, 2007
United States Posts: 95
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
We are beginning a cleanup project for the Master Headshot database will will include removing unneeded birth years.  If anyone is interested in helping, please PM me and I'll give you the details.

With enough help, this should go quickly.

Thanks everyone!
Juoquim

Kansas City Flying Disc Club - Disc Golf's KC Home
addicted2dvd's TV Ep Guides
DVDP Resource Centre
My Collection
DVD collector's Dream!!!
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registrantgardibolt
digitally Obsessed
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 1,414
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Staid S Barr:
Quote:
So this would actually induce me to add a BY, where many people voice the opinion to stay away from these for the moment.


The longer it takes Ken to come up with a BY solution, the more they're going to proliferate through the database like a virus.  At this point I doubt there is a solution other than trashing BY altogether.  It was a poor design idea to add the feature without providing any rules or guidance for when it is to be used.
"This movie has warped my fragile little mind."
    Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion Page: 1... 7 8 9 10  Previous   Next