Author |
Message |
Registered: May 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,475 |
| Posted: | | | | I'm looking into purchasing a scanner that is fairly simple to use. Any suggestions would be apprechiated. Thank you in advance. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,394 |
| Posted: | | | | Cannon makes good ones. I'd recommend a USB scanner, though. No reason to fool around with adding a card into the PC. | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole) Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges. DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | I recommend anything HP or Epson, Canon has proven to be problematic in my experience. Microtek used to be good butI have no current experience with them.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,694 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Kathy: Quote: I'm looking into purchasing a scanner that is fairly simple to use. Any suggestions would be apprechiated. Thank you in advance. Microtek makes a good line of scanners, ranging in price from dirt cheap to a couple hundred. They are USB based, reliable as dirt, and the software that comes with them is first rate. My current one is a model 4850, 48-bit color, 4800 x 2400 dpi ccd. Do a bit of research, though, and be sure to get a model (regardless of the brand you choose) that lets you remove the glass bed from the base for cleaning. | | | John
"Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice!" Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964 Make America Great Again! | | | Last edited: by Rifter |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 813 |
| Posted: | | | | I use a HP Scanjet 4850 and it is by far the best scanner I have owed. it is really quick, and barely need to touch the scans once done as the color balance etc is brilliantly accurate. | | | Andy
"Credited as" Names Database |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 793 |
| Posted: | | | | I'm with kdh, I'd say go with a Canon. I used to have only hp, but I kept having color banding problems, no matter what model they all had the problem. I'm on my second Canon, a 4200F at the moment, and they've never disappointed. I barely have to do any retouching for colors, and it's really quick. As for specs, its got a 3200 dpi optical resolution 48-bit color, and it can do slides and negatives. It's a nice little trusty machine. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,911 |
| Posted: | | | | I recently purchased a Canon Canoscan 4400f. I love it. It's USB based and the best scanner I have owned to date. | | | Signature banned: Reason out of date... |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,494 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Kathy: Quote: I'm looking into purchasing a scanner that is fairly simple to use. Any suggestions would be apprechiated. Thank you in advance. I see you currently have : Accepted Image Contributions: Zero . I'll check in next month to see if that number has changed.. | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 844 |
| Posted: | | | | gonna have to go with Canon...the scans I have made for my Parents with their HP all look like crap compared to the ones I make with my CanoScan LiDE 50. Banding problems galore. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,796 |
| Posted: | | | | Do you want just a scanner or a multi--function printer (copy, sans, prints)? I go to one of the web sites where you can pick your price range, etc. Example for reviews and prices: multi-function: CNETPCMAGor scanners CNETPCMAG I have a Canon Pixma MP600 multi-function printer for every day use and a MICRTEK ScanMaker 5 for reflective surfaces, film, slides, etx.etc.). | | | We don't need stinkin' IMDB's errors, we make our own. Ineptocracy, You got to love it. "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." - Abraham Lincoln |
|
Registered: April 5, 2007 | Posts: 17 |
| Posted: | | | | I use a Canon 4200F and think it does a decent job. The only glitch i found: the reds are a little on the orange/yellow side, but that's easy to fix in postwork. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 630 |
| Posted: | | | | I have seen a lot of excelent HP hardware (including scanners) over the time. Unfortunately, I have yet to see a driver from HP that was anything but a total disaster. So I would go with whatever Canon or Epson I could easily buy - and I wouldn't touch a HP with the water from a remote controlled firehose. | | | Regards Lars |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,796 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting lmoelleb: Quote: I have seen a lot of excelent HP hardware (including scanners) over the time. Unfortunately, I have yet to see a driver from HP that was anything but a total disaster. So I would go with whatever Canon or Epson I could easily buy - and I wouldn't touch a HP with the water from a remote controlled firehose. I had an HP Office Jet, and the software with sucked. Any problem would cause a reboot to clear it. And I was continually checking for any updates. | | | We don't need stinkin' IMDB's errors, we make our own. Ineptocracy, You got to love it. "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." - Abraham Lincoln |
|
| JonM | Registered 28 Dec 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 343 |
| Posted: | | | | I used to work for a HP reseller. I think theirs are the best quality scanners available and I'm not just saying that because I used to work for them. Beware Photosmart scanners though, as they come with software that is basically rubbish.
It's funny seeing this thread though with several knocks for HP and a bunch of recommendations for Canon. I'm not sure about right now, but historically, HP and Canon shared their technology with each other. Usually repairing a HP printer or scanner with HP parts was impossible because of the ridiculous cost, but dealers could always find the equivalent Canon part. Identical, but dirt cheap. | | | Jon "When Mister Safety Catch Is Not On, Mister Crossbow Is Not Your Friend."
|
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 1,982 |
| Posted: | | | | I have a Deskjet F300 (HP), not the best but the price is good and, more important, the ink doesn't cost a fortune.
It's a 3 in one that's explain the comment about the ink. | | | Last edited: by Jimmy S |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,747 |
| |