Author |
Message |
Registered: April 8, 2007 | Posts: 1,057 |
| Posted: | | | | Hi Guys, Internet Explorer IE loads generally quicker than FireFox FF, because a portion of IE is pre-loaded by the OS via windows "prefetch." Firefox does not use windows prefetch, but it can & will speed up loading of FF. Right Click FF shortcut > choose properties > at 'Target' at the end of the line, which looks like "...firefox.exe" add a space plus /prefetch:1 So the end of the Target line would look like: ...firefox.exe /prefetch:1 Choose apply then OK. The second time you start FF it will be much quicker. First start of FF info is going to the OS's prefetch, for future speedier starts. | | | If I felt any better I'd be sick! Envy is mental theft. If you covet another mans possessions, then you should be willing to take on his responsibilities, heartaches, and troubles, along with his money. D. Koontz |
|
Registered: March 18, 2007 | Posts: 150 |
| Posted: | | | | Well done that man - V. Useful hint | | | Learning is not mandatory, but then neither is survival. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,804 |
| Posted: | | | | Yes, good advice, Rico! If you like a few more tweaks and a little bit more comfort, I would recommend THIS! | | | Thorsten |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | Very Useful and it works on Opera too | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 793 |
| Posted: | | | | It's a so called "Urban Legend". Have a read here and here. Sorry Rico. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,804 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting RossRoy: Quote: It's a so called "Urban Legend". Have a read here and here.
Sorry Rico. Can anybody confirm this by testing the startup time with or without this parameter? (My pc is a lame duck anyway...) | | | Thorsten |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 793 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting kahless: Quote: Can anybody confirm this by testing the startup time with or without this parameter? (My pc is a lame duck anyway...) It's an urban legend in that it will not improve every application the same way. I read that iTunes benefits from it, as does Windows Media Player (obviously, since that's where it's been discovered). But for something like Firefox... I don't know.. You might be better off with the Firefox Pre-Loader |
|
Registered: April 8, 2007 | Posts: 1,057 |
| Posted: | | | | Hi Guys,
I believe Kahless is correct we need to time with & without. I don't use it any longer, but FasterFox has a neat little timer, built in.
Take Care Rico | | | If I felt any better I'd be sick! Envy is mental theft. If you covet another mans possessions, then you should be willing to take on his responsibilities, heartaches, and troubles, along with his money. D. Koontz |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,804 |
| Posted: | | | | Oh well, I see. Maybe mostly M$ applications benefit from this parameter. Honni soit qui mal y pense | | | Thorsten |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 235 |
| Posted: | | | | It only improves the second startup? That won't really help me much as FF is the first thing I open and the last thing I close when start my PC | | | DVD Profiler på Dansk |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,804 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting mikl: Quote: It only improves the second startup?
That won't really help me much as FF is the first thing I open and the last thing I close when start my PC AFAIK, once started with the prefetch parameter, there will be a permanent entry in the Windows/Prefetch Folder. The file ends with*.pf and will not be automatically deleted. I personally delete all entries in this folder, because I think, that the Windows system startup goes faster after this. | | | Thorsten | | | Last edited: by kahless |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 235 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting kahless: Quote: Quoting mikl:
Quote: It only improves the second startup?
That won't really help me much as FF is the first thing I open and the last thing I close when start my PC
AFAIK, once started with the prefetch parameter, there will be a permanent entry in the Windows/Prefetch Folder. The file ends with*.pf and will not be automatically deleted. I personally delete all entries in this folder, because I think, that the Windows system startup goes faster after this. I have 118 files in this folder! Do you recommend deleting everything in this folder (and is it safe?)? | | | DVD Profiler på Dansk |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting mikl: Quote: Quoting kahless:
Quote: Quoting mikl:
Quote: It only improves the second startup?
That won't really help me much as FF is the first thing I open and the last thing I close when start my PC
AFAIK, once started with the prefetch parameter, there will be a permanent entry in the Windows/Prefetch Folder. The file ends with*.pf and will not be automatically deleted. I personally delete all entries in this folder, because I think, that the Windows system startup goes faster after this.
I have 118 files in this folder! Do you recommend deleting everything in this folder (and is it safe?)? It is quite safe to delete the entries of the prefetch folder but of no use to the boot performance (did it once and measured startup-time via bootvis. The result was depriving +6 seconds with a fresh deleted prefetch). It's quite simple to explain why: Windows renews the entries at the next startup. so booting will take longer. The only positive thing to say about this method is that by this you delete the non-used entries in the prefetch folder. | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,692 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting mikl: Quote: Quoting kahless:
Quote:
AFAIK, once started with the prefetch parameter, there will be a permanent entry in the Windows/Prefetch Folder. The file ends with*.pf and will not be automatically deleted. I personally delete all entries in this folder, because I think, that the Windows system startup goes faster after this.
I have 118 files in this folder! Do you recommend deleting everything in this folder (and is it safe?)? Have a read of this and it seems clear that this would make your PC slower. Quoting RossRoy: Quote: It's a so called "Urban Legend". Have a read here and here. . | | | Paul |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,692 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote:
It is quite safe to delete the entries of the prefetch folder but of no use to the boot performance (did it once and measured startup-time via bootvis. The result was depriving +6 seconds with a fresh deleted prefetch). It's quite simple to explain why: Windows renews the entries at the next startup. so booting will take longer. The only positive thing to say about this method is that by this you delete the non-used entries in the prefetch folder. From the following it looks like there is a maximum number anyway so the ones which won't be used again will gradually get deleted. And the only way entries get in here is when they get added whilst a program is starting. Quoting RossRoy: Quote: It's a so called "Urban Legend". Have a read here and here.
Sorry Rico. | | | Paul |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting kahless: Quote:
Can anybody confirm this by testing the startup time with or without this parameter? (My pc is a lame duck anyway...) Checked it out now (Results for Opera): Startup incl. Login-page of invelos.com: 9 seconds with prefetch flag 9 seconds without prefetch flag But at least it felt faster (Possibly just like racing-makeup on a VW Golf) | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
|