|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
Electronics Searches @ U.S. and Dutch Borders |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | (English) When you travel to the United State with your Laptop: Clarity Sought on Electronics Searches U.S. Agents Seize Travelers' DevicesBy Ellen Nakashima, Washington Post Staff Writer, Thursday, February 7, 2008; Page A01 (Dutch) Wanneer je met je laptop naar de States reist: VS controleert laptopgegevens reizigersEen groot farmaceutisch bedrijf in België waarschuwde vorige week zijn topmensen die regelmatig naar de Verenigde Staten reizen. De kans bestaat immers dat de gegevens in de laptops gescreend worden door de Amerikaanse overheid. Redactie CRN /Datanews, Channelweb, 7 maart 2008 | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,692 |
| Posted: | | | | That's terrible. | | | Paul |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | You never know when you go over there and take your DVD Profiler collection with you over there on your precious laptop. | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | Follow Up: No suspicion needed for laptop searches at borders and airports – US Appeals court by Humphrey Cheung A Federal Appeals Court has ruled that US Customs officers do not need reasonable suspicion to search the contents of laptop hard drives and other media. In a 3-0 decision, the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled that laptops are just like any other physical property and can be searched at the nation’s borders. The judges also said airports with immigration checkpoints also serve as border stations. | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | Last edited: by ? |
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,715 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting pauls42: Quote: That's terrible. ... as traveling to America all... AA | | | Complete list of Common Names • A good point for starting with Headshots (and v11.1) |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | The same is happening at the Dutch Border (Airports) (rough translation, but you get the idea) Mobile phone, laptops and USB-sticks of travellers are drained on schiphol by the military police and checked on child porn, provisionally it still concerns a test. Traders would carry with, from fear for detection by means of the Internet, the objected to material always more often physical with itself. It concerns then all kinds of data carriers. The recherche wants select now or they can search these apparatuss on prohibited material. According to the telegraph the test on schiphol with drain of data carriers at borders passages in fact secret would have had remain. To the implementation of it, as it happens, still legio legal problems stick. Have the royal military police under the guidance of the Public Prosecution Service in Haarlem, customs authorities and KLPD pilot kept concerning the monitoring of the Netherlands bring in of child porn by so-called child porn couriers, as well as sex tourism, thus an official declaration of justice. It especially escape the military police would do be to countries where child porn are manufactured, as well as checking flights lands where sex tourism takes place, such as Thailand, Brazil, Sri Lanka and Vietnam. The military police do not want say what the criteria for the control to be. However, it confirms that data carriers such as laptops, digital cameras and CD-Rom have been checked. (Dutch Articles) Marechaussee zuigt laptop van reizigers leegArtikel 'De Telegraaf' | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | Last edited: by ? |
| Registered: March 21, 2007 | Posts: 171 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Giga Wizard: Quote: Follow Up: No suspicion needed for laptop searches at borders and airports – US Appeals court by Humphrey Cheung A Federal Appeals Court has ruled that US Customs officers do not need reasonable suspicion to search the contents of laptop hard drives and other media. In a 3-0 decision, the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled that laptops are just like any other physical property and can be searched at the nation’s borders. The judges also said airports with immigration checkpoints also serve as border stations. I think it is disgusting what the U.S. does in complete disregard to what is right. I stongly suspect that if any one of these judges, who said it is acceptable, had had their laptops scrutinized as indicated, they wouldn't have voted the way they did. | | | Graham |
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 1,982 |
| Posted: | | | | You know what? I'm more than happy to live in a country where our autority doesn't see us first as criminal suspect. Maybe the real "land of the free" is really in the north. |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,394 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Giga Wizard: Quote: Follow Up: No suspicion needed for laptop searches at borders and airports – US Appeals court by Humphrey Cheung A Federal Appeals Court has ruled that US Customs officers do not need reasonable suspicion to search the contents of laptop hard drives and other media. In a 3-0 decision, the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled that laptops are just like any other physical property and can be searched at the nation’s borders. The judges also said airports with immigration checkpoints also serve as border stations. This is also troubling because the Ninth US Circuit Court is considered the most liberal and left leaning of the appelate courts in the US. It's the court which can be called on to render judgements the vast majority of US Citizens disagree with, often dealing with free speech issues. Frankly, it's the LAST place I would have expected this particular decision to come from. | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole) Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges. DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | (English) by Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Electronic Border Searches: An Open LetterMay 1, 2008 Chairman Bennie G. Thompson Ranking Member Peter T. King United States House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security Dear Chairman Thompson and Ranking Member King: We are writing to urge the House Committee on Homeland Security to hold hearings on the Department of Homeland Security's practice of searching and seizing Americans' digital information and electronic devices at U.S. borders. We also urge you to consider legislation to prevent abusive search practices by border agents and protect all Americans against suspicionless digital border inspections. In a free country, the government cannot have unlimited power to read, seize, store and use all information on any electronic device carried by any traveler entering or leaving the nation. This issue is particularly critical in light of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' recent decision in United States v. Arnold, which permits customs officials to search laptop computers at the border without any suspicion or cause.1 Despite reassurances that border patrol agents are well trained and supervised,2 the public has been unable to learn through open government laws which policies and procedures Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) has in place to protect travelers against arbitrary or abusive searches. Therefore, Congress must exercise oversight to ensure that border searches are not overly invasive or discriminatory, and establish appropriate safeguards to protect any information collected and maintained by the government. ... (Dutch) EFF wil hoorzitting over doorzoeken van laptops door douaneDe Electronic Frontier Foundation stapt naar het Congres in een poging het doorzoeken van laptops door de douane aan banden te leggen. De privacy-organisatie wil dat de overheid een onderzoek naar de praktijken instelt. ... | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. | | | Last edited: by ? |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 3,830 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | Sources for one or more of the changes and/or additions were not submitted. Please include the sources for your changes in the contribution notes, especially for cast and crew additions. |
|
|
Invelos Forums->General: General Discussion |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|