Author |
Message |
Registered: April 13, 2007 | Posts: 651 |
| Posted: | | | | Anyone out there have it and have checked the quality of the transfer? I have read several places that it's kinda like the first edition of The Fifth Element, in other words, crappy. I haven't bought it myself, yet, but want to have it confirmed from other users here, or from other forums that is reliable. I don't know how to react on those screenshots that are taken, it's kind of hard to believe that a BD-ROM player in a computer gives a reliable screenshot. The screenshot is ok, but a BD-ROM player isn't what we call high-end. So if all of the "reviews" are based on BD-ROM playing, I would like to hear from people with stand alone players and good TV's. The transfer should be better on BD anyway compared to my R1 signature edition, imo... | | | "What's God?" "You know when you want something really bad and you wish for it?, God's the guy that ignores you" -The Island, Steve Buscemi |
|
Registered: May 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,033 |
| Posted: | | | | Doesn't this not come out till next week? but check blu-ray.com's review...once they put one up
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/movies.php?id=4735
-Agrare |
|
Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,506 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Agrare: Quote: Doesn't this not come out till next week? but check blu-ray.com's review...once they put one up
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/movies.php?id=4735
-Agrare You're right about that but some sites do send them out early. I've had several releases up to 3 weeks before they've been officially released before so there might be some who have it already. |
|
Registered: May 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,033 |
| Posted: | | | | wow, 3 weeks. I've heard of a couple days or more commonly delivery on the release day but didn't realize there could be that much of an early delivery (I don't really preorder much)
I am suprised blu-ray.com hasn't reviewed it yet because I know sites like that tend to get advanced copies for review.
-Agrare |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | I've only seen the pictures at DVDBeaver and I was not impressed. The pictures display signs of both edge enhancement and digital noise reduction. Compared to Braveheart, it looks quite poor...
You may not notice this on a small screen but it's a major PITA for those with large projection screens. | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,414 |
| Posted: | | | | We still haven't received a review copy at digitallyobsessed.com. | | | "This movie has warped my fragile little mind." |
|
Registered: April 13, 2007 | Posts: 651 |
| Posted: | | | | I also know that the release is september 1st, and the earliest "review" I saw was this site. But yet again, it's hard to say when there's used a BD-ROM to take the capture. And if all the "reviwers" used a HTPC/PS3 for a source and not a stand-alone BD player, I will as mentioned wait for serious reviews from highdefdigest or similar to test it properly. I just can't believe it's that bad on BD when Scanbox dvd's looks great from a dvd player with upconversion. (Scanbox is a scandinavian distributor who usually have crappy releases, with no extras, MPEG sound, and wrong aspectratios, like 4:3 letterbox on most releases, but in the later years they have got anamorphic releases) | | | "What's God?" "You know when you want something really bad and you wish for it?, God's the guy that ignores you" -The Island, Steve Buscemi |
|
Registered: May 22, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,033 |
| Posted: | | | | I don't see why a BD-Rom drive would be of lower quality than a standalone player, or at least make a significant difference. The computer can handle the resolutions, I guess I could see the software player being used having an effect but the drive is just providing the raw information off the disc is it not?
-Agrare |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,197 |
| Posted: | | | | If there was some problem with the capturing process, surely it would be visible on the Braveheart caps as well, but it's not. | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
Registered: March 10, 2009 | Posts: 2,248 |
| Posted: | | | | It appears to be ok
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film/DVDCompare7/gladiator.htm
People kind of get there hopes up about certain films think there going to look awesome and then complain about something stupid like the grain.
Like the Coppola restoration of the Godfather films which was awesome but some ignorant people complain about it.
Not every movie is suppose to look like Iron Man or a pure digital source like Wall-E |
|
Registered: December 10, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,004 |
| Posted: | | | | That DVDBeaver link doesn't say that it's okay, just the the problems are exaggerated. Check out Bill Hunt's comments on The Digital Bits. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,796 |
| Posted: | | | | Amazon's release date is today. All the rewiews there an the movie is as it was when it first came out, great movie, but the reviews on the transfer say it sucks big time! | | | We don't need stinkin' IMDB's errors, we make our own. Ineptocracy, You got to love it. "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." - Abraham Lincoln |
|
Registered: March 18, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,550 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting gardibolt: Quote: We still haven't received a review copy at digitallyobsessed.com. Yeah, mine did not arrive either. |
|
Registered: March 16, 2007 | Posts: 405 |
| Posted: | | | | I picked up both Braveheart and Gladiator Sapphire Series despite the so-called edge enhancement and DNR simply because BestBuy was selling them @$17.99 each if you purchased both together!!! Hopefully Paramount will issue a replacement disc in the future since this Sapphire Series is going to be their best foot forward!!! | | | My Collection!!! |
|