Author |
Message |
Registered: March 16, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 943 |
| Posted: | | | | boot harddrive? Do you prefer one brand over another? I'm looking for another one...
Thanks for your time & info. | | | Just in from somewhere left of the middle of nowhere The Holy See Hell |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 525 |
| Posted: | | | | 60gb ocz vertex ssd. Makes booting really quick. Other disc is a seagate 250gb 7200rpm.
But most of my data is over a network on my whs box with its 28tb. | | | Home of the phpDVDProfiler forums |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 27 |
| Posted: | | | | Assuming you are running Windows, I'd get a 120-250GB. They are relatively inexpensive. Most programs want to install to the boot drive and some do not give you an option to relocate to another drive/partition. A drive in that range of size will give you plenty of room and, if you also have a second or external drive, you can move data to those.
As far as brands of hard drives, I tend to prefer Seagate and Western Digital. |
|
Registered: March 10, 2009 | Posts: 2,248 |
| Posted: | | | | Mine is oh wait......never mind |
|
Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,851 |
| Posted: | | | | I've got a 128 GB Crucial SSD at home. I keep all my data on another drive. At work I'm running two 128 GB Crucial SSDs in a RAID 0 configuration (256 GB boot drive), and again have my data on another drive. Both setups work very well for me.
--------------- |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,337 |
| Posted: | | | | With SSD drives you should take a note that you buy a latest generation drive. Older SSD drives are much slower, but also cheaper. With System drive I'd go fastest that I could find, size ~120GB. |
|
Registered: June 21, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,621 |
| Posted: | | | | That question is just a bit too personal. 2-500GB in computer, and 300GB external for back-up. When I picked up teh external, I had a 150GB inside so it was plenty, now I'm close to needing another back-up drive, or one to dedicate to classic porn. |
|
Registered: April 17, 2007 | Posts: 187 |
| Posted: | | | | Drive C: Intel 160GB X-25 SSD Drive D: WD 150GB Velociraptor 10K RPM Drive E: WD 300GB Velociraptor 10K RPM | | | Tom
IOS Ver. 2.1.4 iPad Mini Retina 64GB Wi-Fi iOS 8.1.1 no JB iPad Air 64GB Wi-Fi iOS 8.1.1 TaiG 1.1 JB | | | Last edited: by b00bie |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,917 |
| Posted: | | | | I have a 250GB SSD for my boot C: and a 1TB drive which is partitioned for 95% into a data drive (D: and mounted onto C:\Data) and the rest into a temp drive.
I have my swap file, temp directories, downloads, and browser cache set up on my temp drive which I have mounted into C:\Temp. This is to reduce activity on the SSD which can lesson it's life span.
Most apps are installed on D: unless they are small in size.
After initial install of Win7 64bit Ultimate and drive config and auto-login enabled, it took 9 seconds to go from boot screen (win logo) to desktop with icons. | | | Last edited: by Dr. Killpatient |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | 80GB OCZ Revo Drive Series SSDPX-1RVD0080 PCIe x4 as Boot 2 x WD Caviar Green WD5000AADS as RAID1 for data | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 | | | Last edited: by Lewis_Prothero |
|
Registered: February 23, 2009 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,580 |
| |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 5,734 |
| Posted: | | | | Quote: boot harddrive? 500.105.736.192 bytes. | | | Don't confuse while the film is playing with when the film is played. [Ken Cole, DVD Profiler Architect] |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,744 |
| Posted: | | | | Internal drive: Samsung, SATA, 149 GB, split into 50 GB on C:, 99 GB on D: External drive 1: Western Digital "My Book", USB, 913 GB on H: External drive 2: Seagate Expansion, USB, 1.81 TB on I: | | | Karsten DVD Collectors Online
| | | Last edited: by DJ Doena |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,917 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Taro: Quote: Both are Western Digital. Never had one fail o me so far (knocking on wood) I have a knack for killing hard drives within a certain proximity. There's a stack of bad drives sitting next to my desk with many brands and most that died less than one year from manufacture. Seems that drives within arm's reach have their life span cut. Used to have a 4 drive RAID, that proved annoying with the high failure rate. I have multiple backup systems and I keep those systems in places that I rarely frequent. I'm trying out SDD media to see how that goes and so far, so good. |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr. Killpatient: Quote: Quoting Taro:
Quote: Both are Western Digital. Never had one fail o me so far (knocking on wood) I have a knack for killing hard drives within a certain proximity. There's a stack of bad drives sitting next to my desk with many brands and most that died less than one year from manufacture. Seems that drives within arm's reach have their life span cut. If you are a heavy user try the professional series of Western Digital (RE3 (Heavy-Duty with a MTBF of 600.000 Start/Stop-cycles compared to 300.000 on a "normal" retail drive) or RE4 (Duty Type S1 (always on) with a MTBF of 1.2 Mio hours) I use them for Servers, NASs and professionally used PCs. Failure rate is extremely low here, the price is about three times higher than the normal retail version though. | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 | | | Last edited: by Lewis_Prothero |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,917 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Silence_of_Lambs: Quote: If you are a heavy user try the professional series of Western Digital (RE3 (Heavy-Duty with a MTBF of 600.000 Start/Stop-cycles compared to 300.000 on a "normal" retail drive) or RE4 (Duty Type S1 (always on) with a MTBF of 1.2 Mio hours)
I use them for Servers, NASs and professionally used PCs. Failure rate is extremely low here, the price is about three times higher than the normal retail version though. I never heard of those before, will need to look into them. But really, there's a proximity thing going on. PC's that are isolated from me haven't had any issues, even ones with massive data use (like my old home-built DVR that could record 8 shows at once, 4 of those in HD). |
|